ArticleFrontiers in physiology2022
Measurement of Blood Velocity With Laser Scanning Microscopy: Modeling and Comparison of Line-Scan Image-Processing Algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurovascular coupling and CONature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laser scanning microscopy is widely used to measure blood hemodynamics with line-scans in physiological and pathological vessels. With scans of broken lines, i.e., lines made of several segments with different orientations, it also allows simultaneous monitoring of vessel diameter dynamics or the activity of specific cells. Analysis of red blood cell (RBC) velocity from line-scans requires specific image-processing algorithms, as angle measurements, Line-Scanning Particle Image Velocimetry (LSPIV) or Fourier transformation of line-scan images. The conditions under which these image-processing algorithms give accurate measurements have not been fully characterized although the accuracy of measurements vary according to specific experimental parameters: the vessel type, the RBC velocity, the scanning parameters, and the image signal to noise ratio. Here, we developed mathematical models for the three previously mentioned line-scan image-processing algorithms. Our models predict the experimental conditions in which RBC velocity measurements are accurate. We illustrate the case of different vessel types and give the parameter space available for each of them. Last, we developed a software generating artificial line-scan images and used it to validate our models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.