Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35463972›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2022

Accuracy and Reliability of CBCT Compared to Clinical Probing in Detection of Trifurcation Defects: An In Vivo Study.

Abdulaziz Mohammad Alsakr, Adriana G Creanga, Abdullah Saad Alqahtani, Khalid Gufran

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdulaziz Mohammad AlsakrDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2878-3871
Adriana G CreangaDepartment of Diagnostic Sciences, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Newark, NJ, USA.
Abdullah Saad AlqahtaniDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0474-7067
Khalid GufranDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9623-559X
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SARutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Furcation defects are areas of pathological bone resorption in multirooted teeth. The aim of the study was to compare the measurements of trifurcation bone loss, measured using CBCT, versus clinical measurements in order to evaluate the efficacy of CBCT as an adjunctive diagnostic tool. Results: The most common tooth with a detected furcation defect was tooth #2 (31.7%), followed by tooth #15 (26.8%) and #3 (21.9%). The least common tooth with a detected furcation defect was #14 (19.5%). The mean values of buccal furcation for clinical and CBCT measurements were 3.01 mm and 2.6 mm, respectively. The measurements of mesial furcation were 2.5 mm and 2.2 mm for CBCT. The distal measurement of clinical examination was 2.7 mm and for CBCT was 2.44 mm. Conclusion: CBCT can be used as an adjunct to clinical furcation measurements and adds useful diagnostic information to assess trifurcation defects. In addition, CBCT limited field of view (FOV) can provide relatively high-resolution images at a reduced dose that is comparable to two-dimensional imaging.

Indexed as

Furcation DefectsSpiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansMolarReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID35463972
PMCPMC9023149
OpenAlexW4224043294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.