Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35463893›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Caregivers' Attitudes Toward COVID-19 Vaccination in Children and Adolescents With a History of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Danilo Buonsenso, Piero Valentini, Marina Macchi, Francesco Folino, Carola Pensabene, Maria Francesca Patria, Carlo Agostoni, Silvana Castaldi, Maurizio Lecce, Maria Lorella Giannì and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Vaccination Open Day: A Cross-Sectional Study on the 2023 Experience in Lombardy Region, Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Danilo BuonsensoDepartment of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy.
Piero ValentiniDepartment of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli", Rome, Italy.
Marina MacchiDepartment of Clinical Science and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Francesco FolinoDepartment of Clinical Science and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Carola PensabeneFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Pediatric Unit, Milan, Italy.
Maria Francesca PatriaFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Pediatric Unit, Milan, Italy.
Carlo AgostoniDepartment of Clinical Science and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Silvana CastaldiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Postgraduate School of Public Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio LecceDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Postgraduate School of Public Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Maria Lorella GiannìDepartment of Clinical Science and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Paola MarchisioFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Pediatric Unit, Milan, Italy.
Gregorio P MilaniDepartment of Clinical Science and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
CHICO Study Group
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITUniversity of Milan · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Limited data are available on the attitudes of caregivers toward COVID-19 vaccination in children and adolescents with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection or Long Covid symptoms. The aim of this study was to investigate the vaccine hesitancy among caregivers of children and adolescents with a documented history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and to explore the possible associations between COVID-19 manifestations and the acceptance of the vaccine. Methods: Caregivers of children or adolescents with a microbiologically confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection evaluated in two University Hospitals were interviewed. Results: We were able to contact 132 caregivers and 9 declined to participate. 68 caregivers (56%) were in favor of COVID-19 vaccination for their child. In the multiple logistic regression, child's age (OR 1.17, 95%CI 1.06-1.28) and hospitalization due to COVID-19 (OR 3.25, 95%CI 1.06-9.95) were positively associated with being in favor of COVID-19 vaccination. On the contrary, the occurrence of child's Long Covid was associated with a higher likelihood of being against the vaccination (OR 0.28, 95%CI 0.10-0.80). Conclusions: This preliminary study shows that only about half of the interviewed parents of children and adolescents with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection are willing to vaccinate them to prevent a repeated COVID-19 infection. These findings might help healthcare workers to provide tailored information to caregivers of children with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Indexed as

caregivershesitancyinfluenzalong covidpapillomavirusparentalpediatricsvaccination

Identifiers

PMID35463893
PMCPMC9021633
OpenAlexW4226056239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.