SynthesisFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Use of Prophylactic Indomethacin in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- PDA in Prematurity: Rethinking a Decades-Old Debate in 2026.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Promising Preventive Strategies for Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Preterm Neonates: A Critical Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Relationship of Indomethacin Exposure With Efficacy and Renal Toxicity Outcomes for Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Antenatal Magnesium Sulfate Benefits Female Preterm Infants but Results in Poor Male Outcomes.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Pathogenesis and Prevention of Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Preterm Infants.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prophylactic indomethacin has been widely used as an effective intervention for reducing mortalities and morbidities in preterm infants including the cardiopulmonary and neurodevelopmental morbidities such as intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), but many studies have reported contradictory outcomes regarding its significance. Therefore, we aim to systematically review and meta-analyze the data of prophylactic indomethacin on preterm infants. Methods: Our systematic search included the following databases: Pubmed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science, The New York Academy of Medicine (NYAM), Virtual health library (VHL), and the System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe (SIGLE) to include studies that assessed the use of prophylactic indomethacin in preterm infants until 12 August 2021. Results: The final list of our included studies is comprised of 23 randomized trials and cohort studies. Among all the studies outcomes, significant favorable outcome was lowering the rate of PDA, surgical PDA ligation ( Conclusion: Since the meta-analysis results regarding effectiveness of prophylactic indomethacin varied based on the study design particularly with regard to outcomes such as surgical PDA ligation and severe IVH, this warrants the need for more evidence regarding the effectiveness of prophylactic indomethacin in very low birth weight infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.