ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Fairness in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Assessing Sex and Racial Bias in Deep Learning-Based Segmentation.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Examining inclusivity: the use of AI and diverse populations in health and social care: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- Quality of reporting in AI cardiac MRI segmentation studies - A systematic review and recommendations for future studies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Automated thigh muscle segmentation using foundation models: validation and impact of segmentation quality.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Improving racial fairness in brain age models using style-transfer synthesis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and the Ethical Foundations of Cardiothoracic Surgery: Evidence, Accountability, and the Limits of Delegated Judgment.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Echo Chambers: Bias and Representation in Cardiac Imaging Datasets for Artificial Intelligence.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence across the cardiovascular diagnostic pathway: a case-based narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: From Automated Acquisition to Precision Diagnostics and Clinical Decision Support.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Sex disparities in deep learning estimation of ejection fraction from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in cardiology: implications for healthcare outcomes.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Promises and challenges of AI-enabled methods for myocardial characterisation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- A pipeline for developing deep learning prognostic prediction models in cardiac magnetic resonance image analysis.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Research on the construction of an AI diagnostic model for plus disease of retinopathy of prematurity based on cross-center fusion datasets.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- An investigation of race bias in deep learning-based segmentation of prostate MRI images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cardiac amyloidosis detection from a single echocardiographic video clip: a novel artificial intelligence-based screening tool.European heart journal · 2025Article
- What Is Fair? Defining Fairness in Machine Learning for Health.Statistics in medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- An investigation into the causes of race bias in artificial intelligence-based cine cardiac magnetic resonance segmentation.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Bias recognition and mitigation strategies in artificial intelligence healthcare applications.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Sociodemographic Disparities in Obtaining Cardiac MRI: Black, White, and Shades of Gray.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques have been proposed for automation of cine CMR segmentation for functional quantification. However, in other applications AI models have been shown to have potential for sex and/or racial bias. The objective of this paper is to perform the first analysis of sex/racial bias in AI-based cine CMR segmentation using a large-scale database. Methods: A state-of-the-art deep learning (DL) model was used for automatic segmentation of both ventricles and the myocardium from cine short-axis CMR. The dataset consisted of end-diastole and end-systole short-axis cine CMR images of 5,903 subjects from the UK Biobank database (61.5 ± 7.1 years, 52% male, 81% white). To assess sex and racial bias, we compared Dice scores and errors in measurements of biventricular volumes and function between patients grouped by race and sex. To investigate whether segmentation bias could be explained by potential confounders, a multivariate linear regression and ANCOVA were performed. Results: Results on the overall population showed an excellent agreement between the manual and automatic segmentations. We found statistically significant differences in Dice scores between races (white ∼94% vs. minority ethnic groups 86-89%) as well as in absolute/relative errors in volumetric and functional measures, showing that the AI model was biased against minority racial groups, even after correction for possible confounders. The results of a multivariate linear regression analysis showed that no covariate could explain the Dice score bias between racial groups. However, for the Mixed and Black race groups, sex showed a weak positive association with the Dice score. The results of an ANCOVA analysis showed that race was the main factor that can explain the overall difference in Dice scores between racial groups. Conclusion: We have shown that racial bias can exist in DL-based cine CMR segmentation models when training with a database that is sex-balanced but not race-balanced such as the UK Biobank.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.