SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Long-Term Effect of β-Blocker Use on Clinical Outcomes in Postmyocardial Infarction Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beta-blocker therapy after myocardial infarction: an umbrella review.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Effects of bisoprolol combined with torasemide on cardiac electrophysiology in patients with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Neuro- and immuno-modulation mediated by the cardiac sympathetic nerve: a novel insight into the anti-ischemic efficacy of acupuncture.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2024Review
- Safety and efficacy of early beta-blocker initiation in acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock: systematic review and meta-analysis.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of a structured pharmacist-delivered intervention for patients post-acute coronary syndromes on all-cause hospitalizations and cardiac-related hospital readmissions: a prospective quasi-experimental study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prior studies provided inconsistent results regarding long-term effect of β-blocker use on clinical outcomes in postmyocardial infarction (MI) patients. Methods: We searched for articles regarding long-term effect of β-blocker use on clinical outcomes in patients after MI and published them before July 2021 in the databases as follows: PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. STATA 12.0 software was used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The study indicated that β-blocker group had significantly lower long-term all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in post-MI patients, compared to no β-blocker group (all-cause mortality: HR, 0.67; 95% CI: 0.56-0.80; cardiovascular mortality: HR, 0.62; 95% CI: 0.49-0.78; MACE: HR, 0.87; 95% CI: 0.75-1.00). The study indicated no significant long-term effect of β-blocker use on risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HF), risk of recurrent MI, risk of stroke, and risk of repeat revascularization in post-MI patients (risk of hospitalization for HF: HR, 0.82; 95% CI: 0.58-1.16; risk of recurrent MI: HR, 0.93; 95% CI: 0.78-1.11; risk of stroke: HR, 0.94; 95% CI: 0.79-1.12; risk of repeat revascularization: HR, 0.91; 95% CI: 0.80-1.04). Conclusions: The meta-analysis demonstrated significant long-term effects of β-blocker use on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and risk of MACE in post-MI patients, whereas no significant long-term effect was shown on risk of hospitalization for HF, risk of recurrent MI, risk of stroke, and risk of repeat revascularization in post-MI patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.