Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35463743›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Multi-Biomarker Points and Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure: Insights From the China PEACE Prospective Heart Failure Study.

Guangda He, Lihua Zhang, Xiqian Huo, Qing Wang, Danli Hu, Xinghe Huang, Jinzhuo Ge, Yongjian Wu, Jing Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guangda HeNational Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Lihua ZhangNational Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xiqian HuoNational Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Qing WangNational Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Danli HuNational Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xinghe HuangNational Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jinzhuo GeNational Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yongjian WuNational Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jing LiNational Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, NHC Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To quantitatively characterize the pattern of systemic impairment reflected by conventional biomarkers and assess how it relates to clinical outcomes and quality of life among patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF). Methods: Patients hospitalized for HF from 52 hospitals in China were enrolled between 2016 and 2018. They were divided into developing and validating cohorts; the developing cohort was used for calculating the weights of biomarkers and constructing the multi-biomarker panel, while the validating one was used for evaluating the relationship between multi-biomarker points and outcomes. In total, five conventional biomarkers reflecting various pathophysiological processes were included in the panel: N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity troponin T, hemoglobin, albumin, and creatinine. The weights of the biomarkers were defined based on their relationship with cardiovascular death, and each patient had a multi-biomarker point ranging from 0 to 12. The primary clinical outcome was cardiovascular death, and the other clinical outcomes included rehospitalization for HF, all-cause death, and all-cause rehospitalization in 1-year. The quality of life was measured using Kansas City Cardiovascular Questionnaire. Multi-variable Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the risks of clinical outcomes, and generalized linear models were used to evaluate the quality of life. Results: In total, 4,693 patients hospitalized for HF were included in this analysis; the median (interquartile range, IQR) age was 67 (57-75) years old and 1,763 (37.6%) were female. The median multi-biomarker point was 5 (IQR, 2-6). There were 18.0% of patients in the low point group (<2), 29.4% in the mid-low point group (2-4), 27.8% in the mid-high point group (5-6), and 24.7% in the high point group (>6). Compared with those in the low point group, the patients in the high point group had a significantly excess risk of cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio: 5.69, 95% CI, 3.33-9.70). Furthermore, patients with higher points were also more prone to worse quality of life. Conclusion: Systemic impairment reflected by abnormal conventional biomarker values was common amongst patients hospitalized for HF and had substantially cumulative adverse influence on clinical outcomes and quality of life.

Indexed as

biomarkerheart failureprognosisquality of lifesurvival

Identifiers

PMID35463743
PMCPMC9021370
OpenAlexW4225646285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.