SynthesisJournal of healthcare engineering2022
Correlation Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Children with Asthma Based on Smart Medical Health.
Synthesis in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: Correlation Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Children with Asthma Based on Smart Medical Health.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-08-16Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/53CA350241FDE0602AE0C70572FBE5
- Retracted
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children are the reserve force for national construction, and children's health is now being paid more and more attention. In today's childhood asthma treatment, many are based on the treatment of common cough, and there is no strict division with asthma. Importantly, the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of childhood asthma has been extensively studied in the medical community. However, there is no clear explanation for its specific efficacy and role. Research on childhood asthma has always been a key topic in medicine. This article aims to conduct a meta-analysis of the correlation between inhaled corticosteroids and asthma in children. This article proposes a more scientific literature screening strategy, which can achieve a higher accuracy rate for meta-analysis. It combines the intelligent medical health system in the analysis of children's asthma to assist in the analysis of curative effects. Such analysis also provides reference significance for related research. The experimental results indicate that inhaled corticosteroids have a good effect on childhood asthma. As the concentration of inhaled glucocorticoid increases, the effect will be better. Specifically, if the concentration is increased by 10%, the effect will be about 15% better, but there are corresponding side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.