ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022
Influence of Nursing Intervention Based on Risk Assessment Model on Self-Efficacy and Postoperative Rehabilitation of Surgical Patients.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of multiple protection model in the operating room on physiological stress and risk events in patients undergoing coronary artery stent implantation.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Article
- Retracted: Influence of Nursing Intervention Based on Risk Assessment Model on Self-Efficacy and Postoperative Rehabilitation of Surgical Patients.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-06-28Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aims to explore the effect of nursing intervention based on risk assessment model on self-efficacy and postoperative rehabilitation of surgical patients. The study applied a risk assessment model to the behavioral intervention of rehabilitation exercise in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 157 patients were selected from a certain hospital, with 52 cases in the experimental group and 55 cases in the control group. A comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation intervention strategy based on TTM is given by researchers trained with professional knowledge, including dividing the stages of behavior change, developing a rehabilitation exercise plan through exercise teaching and exercise training, diet and lifestyle guidance, and urging patients to take regular medication and regular follow-up. The stage of rehabilitation movement behavior change improved. The preexperiment health status was (35.39 ± 14.31), and the overall health of the control group was (32.59 ± 15.41). Overall health status and QOL scores were relatively low in both the groups. The intervention group scored higher than the control group. After coronary stent implantation, the heart restores its original pumping function, various organs and tissues receive effective blood perfusion, and the symptoms of myocardial infarction such as profuse sweating, dizziness, fatigue, and precordial discomfort are effectively relieved. The physical discomfort can gradually improve or even recover to the functional state before the onset of the disease. Before the intervention, the self-efficacy score of the intervention group was (23.68 ± 4.49). After the intervention, the self-efficacy score of the intervention group was (26.21 ± 4.09), while the self-efficacy score of the control group before the intervention was (22.21 ± 4.1). After the intervention, the self-efficacy score of the control group was (25.23 ± 4.41). Although the self-efficacy score of the control group was improved, the difference was small, and the intervention effect was not obvious. It indicates that risk assessment intervention can improve patients' self-efficacy level and quality of life of postoperative rehabilitation patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.