Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35463669›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022

Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model of Preterm Birth Using Electronic Health Record.

Qi Sun, Xiaoxuan Zou, Yousheng Yan, Hongguang Zhang, Shuo Wang, Yongmei Gao, Haiyan Liu, Shuyu Liu, Jianbo Lu, Ying Yang and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Transforming neonatal care with artificial intelligence: challenges, ethical consideration, and opportunities.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qi SunNational Human Genetics Resource Center, National Research Institute for Family Planning, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4171-4272
Xiaoxuan ZouHaidian Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Beijing 100080, China.
Yousheng YanBeijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Beijing 100010, China.
Hongguang ZhangNational Human Genetics Resource Center, National Research Institute for Family Planning, Beijing 100081, China.
Shuo WangHaidian Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Beijing 100080, China.
Yongmei GaoHaidian Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Beijing 100080, China.
Haiyan LiuHaidian Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Beijing 100080, China.
Shuyu LiuHaidian Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Beijing 100080, China.
Jianbo LuNational Human Genetics Resource Center, National Research Institute for Family Planning, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7555-2163
Ying YangNational Human Genetics Resource Center, National Research Institute for Family Planning, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9799-3293
Xu MaNational Human Genetics Resource Center, National Research Institute for Family Planning, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7674-3589
Hainan Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNBeijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Preterm birth (PTB) was one of the leading causes of neonatal death. Predicting PTB in the first trimester and second trimester will help improve pregnancy outcomes. The aim of this study is to propose a prediction model based on machine learning algorithms for PTB. Method: Data for this study were reviewed from 2008 to 2018, and all the participants included were selected from a hospital in China. Six algorisms, including Naive Bayesian (NBM), support vector machine (SVM), random forest tree (RF), artificial neural networks (ANN), K-means, and logistic regression, were used to predict PTB. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were used to assess the performance of the model. Results: A total of 9550 pregnant women were included in the study, of which 4775 women had PTB. A total of 4775 people were randomly selected as controls. Based on 27 weeks of gestation, the area under the curve (AUC) and the accuracy of the RF model were the highest compared with other algorithms (accuracy: 0.816; AUC = 0.885, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.873-0.897). Meanwhile, there was positive association between the accuracy and AUC of the RF model and gestational age. Age, magnesium, fundal height, serum inorganic phosphorus, mean platelet volume, waist size, total cholesterol, triglycerides, globulins, and total bilirubin were the main influence factors of PTB. Conclusion: The results indicated that the prediction model based on the RF algorithm had a potential value to predict preterm birth in the early stage of pregnancy. The important analysis of the RF model suggested that intervention for main factors of PTB in the early stages of pregnancy would reduce the risk of PTB.

Indexed as

Premature BirthBayes TheoremElectronic Health RecordsFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMachine LearningMalePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35463669
PMCPMC9020923
OpenAlexW4224026226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.