Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35463483›Full record

ArticleThe Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF2022

Incomparable Punishments: How Economic Inequality Contributes to the Disparate Impact of Legal Fines and Fees.

Lindsay Bing, Becky Pettit, Ilya Slavinski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The long-term impact of debt relief for indigent defendants in a misdemeanor court.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. What Is Wrong with Monetary Sanctions? Directions for Policy, Practice, and Research.The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF · 2022
    Article
  5. Studying the System of Monetary Sanctions.The Russell Sage Foundation journal of the social sciences : RSF · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lindsay BingLindsay Bing is a doctoral student in the Department of Sociology at the University of Texas at Austin, United States. Becky Pettit is the Barbara Pierce Bush Regents Professor of Liberal Arts in Sociology at the University of Texas at Austin, United States, where she is also a faculty affiliate of the Population Research Center. Ilya Slavinski is clinical assistant professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of Buffalo, United States.
Becky PettitLindsay Bing is a doctoral student in the Department of Sociology at the University of Texas at Austin, United States. Becky Pettit is the Barbara Pierce Bush Regents Professor of Liberal Arts in Sociology at the University of Texas at Austin, United States, where she is also a faculty affiliate of the Population Research Center. Ilya Slavinski is clinical assistant professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of Buffalo, United States.
Ilya SlavinskiLindsay Bing is a doctoral student in the Department of Sociology at the University of Texas at Austin, United States. Becky Pettit is the Barbara Pierce Bush Regents Professor of Liberal Arts in Sociology at the University of Texas at Austin, United States, where she is also a faculty affiliate of the Population Research Center. Ilya Slavinski is clinical assistant professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of Buffalo, United States.

Funding

Training Program in Population StudiesT32HD007081 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI Aprile Dawn Benner, Abigail Mae Weitzman · 1985 to 2026
$6.8M
Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Elizabeth T. Gershoff · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-level misdemeanor and traffic violations draw tens of millions of people into local courts to pay fines and fees each year, generating billions of dollars in revenue. We examine how standardized legal fines and fees for low-level charges induce disparate treatment and result in disparate impact. Using a mixed-methods approach that incorporates administrative court records as well as interviews with criminal defendants from Texas, we find that although the majority of defendants readily pay for and conclude their case, African American, Latinx, and economically disadvantaged defendants spend disproportionate amounts of money and time resolving theirs. Analysis of criminal case records illustrates the disparate impact of monetary sanctions through the accrual of debt and time spent resolving a charge. Interviews reveal irreconcilable tensions between American ideals of equality in sentencing and the meaning and value of money and time in an increasingly unequal society.

Indexed as

criminal legal systemeconomic inequalityinequalitymarketizationmisdemeanorsmonetary sanctions

Identifiers

PMID35463483
PMCPMC9030976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.