Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35463344›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Modified Prostate Health Index Density Significantly Improves Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa) Detection.

Haojie Chen, Yuhang Qian, Yanyuan Wu, Bowen Shi, Jiatong Zhou, Fajun Qu, Zhengqin Gu, Jie Ding, Yongjiang Yu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04251546 (Prediction Model fo Screening and Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in PSA Gray Zone Based on Serum PHI Combined With TPV), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04251546 unknown statusnot on this map

Prediction Model fo Screening and Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in PSA Gray Zone Based on Serum PHI Combined With TPV

TypeobservationalSponsorXinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineRan2020 to 2022Enrolled80ConditionsProstate Cancer, PSAArmsp2PSA, Ultrasonic parameters, Transperineal prostate biopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haojie ChenDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yuhang QianDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yanyuan WuDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Bowen ShiDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jiatong ZhouDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Fajun QuDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Zhengqin GuDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jie DingDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yongjiang YuDepartment of Urology, School of Medicine, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNXinHua Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early screening of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) may offer opportunities in revolutionizing the survival benefits of this lethal disease. We sought to introduce a modified prostate health index density (mPHI) model using imaging indicators and to compare its diagnostic performance for early detection of occult onset csPCa within the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) gray zone with that of PHI and PHID. Methods and Participation: Between August 2020 and January 2022, a training cohort of 278 patients (total PSA 4.0-10.0 ng/ml) who were scheduled for a prostate biopsy were prospectively recruited. PHI and PHID were compared with mPHI Results: This model was tested in a training cohort consisting of 73 csPCa, 14 non-clinically significant prostate cancer(non-csPCa), and 191 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) samples. In the univariate analysis for the PSA gray zone cohort, for overall PCa, the AUC of mPHI (0.856) was higher than PHI (0.774) and PHID (0.835). For csPCa, the AUC of mPHI (0.859) also surpassed PHI (0.787) and PHID (0.825). For detection of csPCa, compared with lower specificities from PHI and PHID, mPHI performed the highest specificity (76.5%), by sparing 60.0% of unnecessary biopsies at the cost of missing 11 cases of csPCa. The mPHI outperformed PHI and PHID for overall PCa detection. In terms of csPCa, mPHI exceeds diagnostic performance with a better net benefit in decision curve analysis (DCA) compared with PHI or PHID. Conclusions: We have developed a modified PHI density (mPHI) model that can sensitively distinguish early-stage csPCa patients within the PSA gray zone. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04251546.

Indexed as

clinically significant prostate cancergray zonemPHIprostate health index densityPSA

Identifiers

PMID35463344
PMCPMC9021722
OpenAlexW4226105985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.