ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation Is an Effective Method for Local Control of Liver Metastases From Lung Cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Is radiofrequency ablation of renal cancer metastases a suitable alternative to surgical metastectomy: A systematic review.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Pooled it
- Research on the Inhibition of Cancer Cell Metastasis by Graphene Oxide Suppresses the Translation of the Snail mRNA.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Article
- Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for small cell lung cancer liver metastases.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- High‑intensity focused ultrasound thermal ablation boosts the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced cancers with liver metastases: A single‑center retrospective cohort study.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Microwave Ablation of Refractory Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Liver.Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 2025Article
- Long-term survival following multimodal therapy for lung cancer with hepatic metastasis: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Small cell lung cancer with liver metastases: from underlying mechanisms to treatment strategies.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical value of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for liver metastasis from lung cancer (LCLM). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 58 patients who underwent RFA for LCLM between January 2014 and December 2019. Primary lung cancer histology included 38 adenocarcinomas, 15 squamous carcinomas, and 5 small cell carcinomas. For 83 metastatic lesions (mean tumor diameter 3.3 ± 1.1 cm, range 0.9-5.0 cm), 65 RFA sessions were performed. Before RFA, 17 and 41 patients presented no and stable extrahepatic metastasis, respectively, whereas 18 and 40 patients had synchronous and metachronous liver metastasis, respectively. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariable analysis. Results: The technical success rate was 96.3% (80/83 lesions). Local tumor progression was observed in 8 (9.8%, 8/82) lesions of 57 (14.0%, 8/57) patients at 4-12 months after RFA. New liver metastases occurred in 27 (46.6%) patients. The overall survival (OS) rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years after RFA were 55.2%, 26.0%, 22.0%, and 14.4%, respectively. The median OS after RFA and after liver metastasis were 14.0 ± 1.6 and 20.0 ± 1.5 months, respectively. Based on the univariable analysis, tumor size (p=0.017), histological type (p=0.015), and timing of liver metastasis (p=0.046) were related to OS. In further multivariable analyses, squamous carcinoma (hazard ratio= 2.269, 95% confidence interval: 1.186-4.339, p=0.013) was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for OS. Based on the univariable analysis, histological type (p=0.010) was identified as parameters significantly related to local tumor progression (LTP)-free survival. Further multivariable analyses revealed that squamous carcinoma (hazard ratio=2.394, 95% confidence interval: 1.260-4.550, p=0.008) was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for LTP-free survival. Conclusion: RFA is a safe therapeutic option for LCLM with acceptable local tumor control, especially in patients with a tumor size ≤3 cm, adenocarcinoma/small cell carcinoma, and metachronous liver metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.