ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Efficacy of Cytokine-Induced Killer Cell Immunotherapy for Patients With Pathologically Pure Glioblastoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- LAK to CIK continuum in glioma immunotherapy: a systematic review of efficacy and safety outcomes.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Advancements and challenges: immunotherapy therapy in high-grade glioma - a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Immunotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Mechanisms of Therapeutic Resistance and Recent Advances in Glioblastoma Treatment.Immunology and cell biology · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Immunotherapeutic Modalities in Glioblastoma: Mechanisms, Efficacy, and Safety ConsiderationsCancers · 2026Review
- Cytokine-induced killer cells combined with temozolomide suppress glioblastoma progression in an orthotopic model and demonstrate clinical feasibility in recurrent glioblastoma.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Preclinical evaluation of DC-CIK cells as potentially effective immunotherapy model for the treatment of glioblastoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Balancing CIK Cell Cancer Immunotherapy and PPAR Ligands: One Potential Therapeutic Application for CNS Malignancies.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Molecular targeted therapy: A new avenue in glioblastoma treatment.Oncology letters · 2023Review
- Feasibility of combination of Gun-Chil-Jung and cytokine-induced killer cells-based immunotherapy for terminal hepatocellular carcinoma patient: a case report.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Reassessing the efficacy of bevacizumab in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A systematic review and external pseudodata-based analysis.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The most common malignant central nervous system tumor is glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cell therapy is a promising type of adoptive cell immunotherapy for various cancers. We previously conducted a randomized clinical trial on CIK cell therapy in patients with GBM. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of CIK immunotherapy for patients with pathologically pure GBM, using data from our previous randomized clinical trial. The difference between overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) according to CIK immunotherapy was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios were calculated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to determine whether CIK cell immunotherapy was independently associated with higher OS and PFS in patients with pure GBM. A total of 156 eligible patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. We confirmed that 125 (80.1%) GBM samples were pure GBM tumors without the presence of other types of tumors. For patients with pure GBM, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in OS between the CIK cell treatment and control groups. However, multivariate Cox regression demonstrated CIK cell immunotherapy as an independent predictor of greater OS (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.97; p = 0.038) and PFS (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36-0.84; p = 0.001) in patients with pathologically pure GBM in the mITT population. This study showed that CIK cell immunotherapy combined with conventional temozolomide chemoradiotherapy could prolong OS and PFS in patients with newly diagnosed pathologically pure GBM, with no significant adverse events related to treatment. However, unlike the results of multivariate Cox analysis, no statistical significance of CIK cell immunotherapy in OS in Kaplan-Meier analysis raises a question. Further studies are required to validate these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.