Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35463306›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancers.

Runkai Huang, Zhenbin Qiu, Chunwen Zheng, Ruijie Zeng, Wanxian Chen, Simeng Wang, Enmin Li, Yiwei Xu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy plus pembrolizumab for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ACTS-29).Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2026
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Runkai HuangDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Zhenbin QiuDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Chunwen ZhengDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Ruijie ZengDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Wanxian ChenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Simeng WangDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Enmin LiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Yiwei XuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Shantou University Medical College · CNShantou University · CNCancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophageal carcinoma is one of the most aggressive malignant diseases. At present, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy are regarded as the standard modalities for the treatments of locally advanced esophageal cancers based on several landmark trials. However, the optimal regimen, radiation dose, and surgical intervals are uncertain and the rate of recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy is high. Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy and reaching a pathological complete response have been reported to have a better survival benefit and a fewer recurrence risk than those non-pathological complete responses. Nevertheless, less than half of patients will reach a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy, and the methods to evaluate the efficacy after neoadjuvant therapy accurately are limited. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been recommended for the treatments of advanced esophageal cancers. Recently, research has been beginning to evaluate the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy combined with neoadjuvant therapy. Here, we will review and discuss the development of the neoadjuvant therapy of locally advanced esophageal cancers and unsolved clinical problems.

Indexed as

chemoradiotherapychemotherapyimmunotherapylocally advanced esophageal cancersneoadjuvant

Identifiers

PMID35463306
PMCPMC9021527
OpenAlexW4226106255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.