ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Value of CT-Based Radiomics in Predicating the Efficacy of Anti-HER2 Therapy for Patients With Liver Metastases From Breast Cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiology-based artificial intelligence for predicting targeted therapy response in pan-cancer: a comprehensive review.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Delta Radiomics and Tumor Size: A New Predictive Radiomics Model for Chemotherapy Response in Liver Metastases from Breast and Colorectal Cancer.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- MRI management of focal liver lesions: what a beginner cannot fail to know.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Utilizing radiomics for differential diagnosis of inverted papilloma and chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps based on unenhanced CT scans.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Combined with Radiomics Facilitating the Personal Treatment of Malignant Liver Tumors.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Predictive machine learning model for microvascular invasion identification in hepatocellular carcinoma based on the LI-RADS system.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to assess the performance of machine learning (ML)-based contrast-enhanced CT radiomics analysis for predicating the efficacy of anti-HER2 therapy for patients with liver metastases from breast cancer. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 83 patients with breast cancer liver metastases. Radiomics features were extracted from arterial phase, portal venous phase, and delayed phase images, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to quantify the reproducibility of features. The training and validation sets consisted of 58 and 25 cases. Variance threshold, SelectKBest, and LASSO logistic regression model were employed for feature selection. The ML classifiers were K-nearest-neighbor algorithm (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), XGBoost, RF, LR, and DT, and the performance of classifiers was evaluated by ROC analysis. Results: The SVM classifier had the highest score in portal venous phase. The results were as follows: The AUC value of the poor prognosis group in validation set was 0.865, the sensitivity was 0.77, and the specificity was 0.83. The AUC value of the good prognosis group in validation set was 0.865, the sensitivity was 0.83, and the specificity was 0.77. In arterial phase, the XGBoost classifier had the highest score. The AUC value of the poor prognosis group in validation set was 0.601, the sensitivity was 0.69, and the specificity was 0.38. The AUC value of the good prognosis group in validation set was 0.601, the sensitivity was 0.38, and the specificity was 0.69. The LR classifier had the highest score in delayed phase. The AUC value of poor prognosis group in validation set was 0.628, the sensitivity was 0.62, and the specificity was 0.67. The AUC value of the good prognosis group in validation set was 0.628, the sensitivity was 0.67, and the specificity was 0.62. Conclusion: Radiomics analysis represents a promising tool in predicating the efficacy of anti-HER2 therapy for patients with liver metastases from breast cancer. The ROI in portal venous phase is most suitable for predicting the efficacy of anti-HER2 therapy, and the SVM algorithm model has the best efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.