Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35463226›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Application of Unsupervised Transfer Technique Based on Deep Learning Model in Physical Training.

Quanbin Zhao, Hanqi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Quanbin ZhaoDepartment of Leisure Sports Teaching and Research Office, Shenyang Sport University, Shenyang 110102, Liaoning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8154-1583
Hanqi WangDepartment of Leisure Sports Teaching and Research Office, Shenyang Sport University, Shenyang 110102, Liaoning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The research purpose is to study the standardization and scientizing of physical training actions. Stacking denoising auto encoder (SDAE), a BiLSTM deep network model (SDAL-DNM) (a kind of training action model), and an unsupervised transfer model are used to deeply study the action problem of physical training. Initially, the physical training action discrimination model adopted here is a combination of stacked noise reduction self-encoder and bidirectional depth network model. Then, this model can collect data for five actions in physical training and further analyze the importance of action standardization for physical training. Afterward, the SDAL-DNM implemented here fully integrates the advantages of SDAE and BiLSTM. Finally, the unsupervised transfer model adopted here is based on SDAL-DNM deep learning (DL). The movement data of the physical training crowd are collected, and then the unsupervised transfer model is trained. According to the movement characteristics of physical training, the data difference between trainers is calculated so that the actions of each trainer can be continuously adapted according to the model, and finally, the benefits of effectively distinguishing the training actions can be achieved. The research shows that before and after unsupervised learning, the average decline of the model used is 1.69%, while the average decline of extreme learning machine (ELM) is 5.5%. The conclusion is that the unsupervised transfer model can improve the discrimination accuracy of physical training actions and provide theoretical support to effectively correct mistakes in physical training actions.

Indexed as

Deep Learning

Identifiers

PMID35463226
PMCPMC9023208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.