Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35463139›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Intrathecal Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics and Glymphatic Enhancement in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

Per Kristian Eide, Aslan Lashkarivand, Åsmund Aleksander Hagen-Kersten, Øivind Gjertsen, Bård Nedregaard, Ruth Sletteberg, Grethe Løvland, Svein Are Sirirud Vatnehol, Are Hugo Pripp, Lars Magnus Valnes and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06857136 (The Role of the Glymphatic System Avaluated Thourgh mr Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of NPH), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06857136 completednot on this map

The Role of the Glymphatic System Avaluated Thourgh mr Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of NPH

TypeobservationalSponsorFondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo BestaRan2021 to 2024Enrolled29ConditionsHydrocephalus, Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Implications of the glymphatic system in the diagnostic and surgical workup of normal pressure hydrocephalus.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. PET Imaging of Neurofluids.Neuroimaging clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Diffusion Tensor Image Analysis ALong the Perivascular Space (DTI-ALPS): Revisiting the Meaning and Significance of the Method.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Per Kristian EideDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Aslan LashkarivandDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Åsmund Aleksander Hagen-KerstenDepartment of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Øivind GjertsenDepartment of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Bård NedregaardDepartment of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Ruth SlettebergDepartment of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Grethe LøvlandThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Svein Are Sirirud VatneholThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Are Hugo PrippOslo Centre of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Lars Magnus ValnesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Geir RingstadDepartment of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOSørlandet Hospital Arendal · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of South-Eastern Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurodegenerative disease, characterized by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow disturbance. Today, the only available treatment is CSF diversion surgery (shunt surgery). While traditional imaging biomarkers typically assess CSF space anatomy, recently introduced imaging biomarkers of CSF dynamics and glymphatic enhancement, provide imaging of CSF dynamics and thereby more specifically reveal elements of the underlying pathophysiology. The biomarkers address CSF ventricular reflux grade as well as glymphatic enhancement and derive from intrathecal contrast-enhanced MRI. However, the contrast agent serving as CSF tracer is administered off-label. In medicine, the introduction of new diagnostic or therapeutic methods must consider the balance between risk and benefit. To this end, we performed a prospective observational study of 95 patients with iNPH, comparing different intrathecal doses of the MRI contrast agent gadobutrol (0.10, 0.25, and 0.50 mmol, respectively), aiming at the lowest reasonable dose needed to retrieve diagnostic information about the novel MRI biomarkers. The present observations disclosed a dose-dependent enrichment of subarachnoid CSF spaces (cisterna magna, vertex, and velum interpositum) with dose-dependent ventricular reflux of tracer in iNPH, as well as dose-dependent glymphatic tracer enrichment. The association between tracer enrichment in CSF and parenchymal compartments were as well dose-related. Intrathecal gadobutrol in a dose of 0.25 mmol, but not 0.10 mmol, was at 1.5T MRI considered sufficient for imaging altered CSF dynamics and glymphatic enhancement in iNPH, even though 3T MRI provided better sensitivity. Tracer enrichment in CSF at the vertex and within the cerebral cortex and subcortical white matter was deemed too low for maintaining diagnostic information from a dose of 0.10 mmol. We conclude that reducing the intrathecal dose of gadobutrol from 0.50 to 0.25 mmol gadobutrol improves the safety margin while maintaining the necessary diagnostic information about disturbed CSF homeostasis and glymphatic failure in iNPH.

Indexed as

cerebrospinal fluidglymphatic functionidiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalusimaging biomarkersintrathecal gadobutrolmagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID35463139
PMCPMC9019061
OpenAlexW4225966490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.