ArticleIndian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB2022
Clarke Error Grid Analysis for Performance Evaluation of Glucometers in a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital.
Article in Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Noninvasive subterahertz glucose monitoring using a communication inspired eye diagram.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A multivariate biosensor for non-invasive glucose and urea monitoringRSC advances · 2025Article
- A deep learning approach for blood glucose monitoring and hypoglycemia prediction in glycogen storage disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Insight into continuous glucose monitoring: from medical basics to commercialized devices.Mikrochimica acta · 2023Review
- An In-Ear PPG-Based Blood Glucose Monitor: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A qualitative assessment of facility readiness and barriers to the facility-based management of childhood severe acute malnutrition in the public healthcare settings in Bangladesh.Public health nutrition · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glucometer is the most commonly used POCT device and guides monitoring of blood glucose level in both clinical settings and outside. Inaccurate glucometer readings resulting in erroneous therapeutic intervention has critical consequences on patient care. Regulatory guidelines for performance evaluation of glucometers are not available in many countries. A robust program implemented by the hospital is essential to ensure accuracy and precision of glucometers to produce optimal results. The objective of this study was to design a quality assurance program for the evaluation of glucometers in a high volume tertiary care referral hospital and evaluate the results from July'18 to July'19. Seventy three glucometers used across the hospital were subjected to Internal Quality Control checks and Proficiency Testing performed once a month and every 3 months respectively. The results were reviewed and plotted on a Bland Altman Graph. Clarke Error Grid Analysis was done to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose concentration as per ISO 15197: 2013. Eight devices were identified as unacceptable by ISO standards and replaced subsequently. 96.83% and 3.17% of the values were in Zone A and B of Clarke Error Grid Analysis. The study complied with the standard which requires that 99% of the values fall within zones A and B. The review of the program after one year and its ability to identify defective glucometers has validated the efficacy of the model. The method used may be suggested as a prototype for quality management of glucometers in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.