Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35463097›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

The Impact of Traditional Chinese Medicine QingreHuoxue Treatment and the Combination of Methotrexate and Hydroxychloroquine on the Radiological Progression of Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: A 52-Week Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.

Rouman Zhang, Xiao-Po Tang, Jian Wang, Wei-Xiang Liu, Jian Liu, Yue Wang, Wei Liu, Yong-Fei Fang, Dong-Yi He, Ying Liu and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Rouman ZhangRheumatology, Guang'anmen Hospital China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Xiao-Po TangRheumatology, Guang'anmen Hospital China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Jian WangRheumatology, Guang'anmen Hospital China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Wei-Xiang LiuRheumatology, Guang'anmen Hospital China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.
Jian LiuRheumatology, University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei 230038, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3101-7553
Yue Wang3 Rheumatology, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Suzhou 215002, China.
Wei LiuRheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 300193, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3364-0966
Yong-Fei FangRheumatology, The Southwest Hospital of AMU, Chongqing 400038, China.
Dong-Yi HeRheumatology, Shanghai Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai 200052, China.
Ying LiuRheumatology, The Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250014, China.
Ming-Li GaoRheumatology, The Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong 250011, China.
Qing-Jun WuRheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.
Zhen-Bin LiRheumatology, Bethune International Peace Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050000, China.
Shi ChenRheumatology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Qing-Chun HuangRheumatology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510220, China.
Yan-Ming XieRheumatology, Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.
Jun-Li ZhangRheumatology, The Fifth Hospital of Xi'an, Xi'an, China.
Cai-Yun ZhouRheumatology, Xiyuan Hospital China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Li MaRheumatology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
Xin-Chang WangRheumatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University of Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou 310005, China.
Quan JiangRheumatology, Guang'anmen Hospital China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2944-154X
Xun GongRheumatology, Guang'anmen Hospital China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100053, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3377-0373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been used successfully to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). QingreHuoxue treatment (QingreHuoxue decoction [QRHXD]/QingreHuoxue external preparation [QRHXEP]) is a Chinese medicine treatment for RA. To date, very few studies have compared the long-term effects of QRHXD with those of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs on RA disease activity and radiological progression. QRHXD delayed the radiological progression and showed long-term clinical efficacy of RA. In clinical experiments, the clinical evidence of delaying the radiological progression of RA patients was obtained. A portion of the patients who participated in the "Traditional Chinese Medicine QingreHuoxue Treatment vs. the Combination of Methotrexate and Hydroxychloroquine for Active Rheumatoid Arthritis" study were followed up for 52 weeks, and intention-to-treat (ITT) and compliance protocol (PP) analyses were used to collect and compare the clinical indicators and imaging data between baseline and week 52. Two radiologists who were blind to treatment scored the images independently. Of the 468 subjects, 141 completed the 52-week follow-up. There were no significant differences among the three groups: the traditional Chinese medicine comprehensive treatment group, the Western medicine treatment group, and the integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment group. There were no differences in the total Sharp score, joint space stenosis score, and joint erosion score at baseline or 52 weeks. In the comparison of the estimated annual radiographic progression (EARP) and the actual annual Sharp total score changes among the three groups, the actual changes were much lower than the EARP at baseline. The radiological progress in all three groups was well controlled. Results of the ITT and PP data sets showed that the disease activity score 28 level of the three groups at 52 weeks was significantly lower than that at baseline. During the 52-week treatment period, the clearance of heat and promotion of blood circulation controlled disease activity and delayed the radiological progress of active RA.

Identifiers

PMID35463097
PMCPMC9019417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.