ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Comparison Between L-312 Hydrophobic-Hydrophilic Acrylate and US-860 UV Hydrophilic Acrylate IOL Opacification Characteristic.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare opacity characteristics of US-860 UV and L-312 IOL, and report the phenomenon of glistenings in hydrophobic-hydrophilic acrylic IOLs. Setting: Qingdao Eye Hospital. Design: Experimental study. Methods: Four medical records (4 eyes) of patients with L-312 or US-860 UV IOL opacification reporting decreased or lost vision who underwent IOL explanation between 2019 and 2021 were reviewed. Explanted IOLs were analyzed by slit-lamp examination, confocal microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) at Qingdao Eye Hospital and Qingdao university of science and technology. Results: The 4 explanted IOLs were represented by 2 hydrophilic acrylic designs. The preoperative mean corrected distance visual acuity changed from 1.84 ± 1.09 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (log MAR) to 0.20 ± 0.03 log MAR postoperatively except case 3. The mean interval of the L-312 IOL was 56.67 ± 14.19 months (range 44 to 72 months), and the interval of the US-860 UV IOL was 27 months. Morphological findings were surface, subsurface calcifications of the US-860 UV IOL material, and the optical region of L-312 IOLs are teeming with a great number of vacuoles by light microscope, scanning electron microscope and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectral. Conclusion: The cause of US-860 UV opacification was primary calcification, and vacuoles resulted in L-312 IOL opacification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.