ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
A Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Ewing's Sarcoma.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developing a prediction model to predict the incidence of metastasis in lung cancer patients using artificial intelligence techniques.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Using machine learning algorithms to predict risk factors of heart failure after complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predictive factors of chemotherapy‑induced nausea and vomiting in elderly patients with gynecological cancer undergoing paclitaxel and carboplatin therapy: A retrospective study.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Enhancing Clinical Decision Making by Predicting Readmission Risk in Patients With Heart Failure Using Machine Learning: Predictive Model Development Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Using machine learning techniques to predict the risk of osteoporosis based on nationwide chronic disease data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Machine learning algorithms to predict treatment success for patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Application of machine learning algorithm in prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Comparison of the effectiveness of different machine learning algorithms in predicting new fractures after PKP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Article
- A machine learning-based model for predicting the risk of early-stage inguinal lymph node metastases in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- A practical dynamic nomogram model for predicting bone metastasis in patients with thyroid cancer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- A Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting the Risk of Developing to M1b Stage of Patients With Germ Cell Testicular Cancer.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Stmol: A component for building interactive molecular visualizations within streamlit web-applications.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- A machine learning-based online web calculator to aid in the diagnosis of sarcopenia in the US community.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In order to provide reference for clinicians and bring convenience to clinical work, we seeked to develop and validate a risk prediction model for lymph node metastasis (LNM) of Ewing's sarcoma (ES) based on machine learning (ML) algorithms. Methods: Clinicopathological data of 923 ES patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and 51 ES patients from multi-center external validation set were retrospectively collected. We applied ML algorithms to establish a risk prediction model. Model performance was checked using 10-fold cross-validation in the training set and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in external validation set. After determining the best model, a web-based calculator was made to promote the clinical application. Results: LNM was confirmed or unable to evaluate in 13.86% (135 out of 974) ES patients. In multivariate logistic regression, race, T stage, M stage and lung metastases were independent predictors for LNM in ES. Six prediction models were established using random forest (RF), naive Bayes classifier (NBC), decision tree (DT), xgboost (XGB), gradient boosting machine (GBM), logistic regression (LR). In 10-fold cross-validation, the average area under curve (AUC) ranked from 0.705 to 0.764. In ROC curve analysis, AUC ranged from 0.612 to 0.727. The performance of the RF model ranked best. Accordingly, a web-based calculator was developed (https://share.streamlit.io/liuwencai2/es_lnm/main/es_lnm.py). Conclusion: With the help of clinicopathological data, clinicians can better identify LNM in ES patients. Risk prediction models established in this study performed well, especially the RF model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.