Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35462973›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Mating status affects female choice when females are signalers.

Naomi L Zweerus, Michiel van Wijk, Isabel M Smallegange, Astrid T Groot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Naomi L ZweerusInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics University of Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4650-8451
Michiel van WijkInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics University of Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands.
Isabel M SmallegangeInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics University of Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6218-7358
Astrid T GrootInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics University of Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9595-0161
University of Amsterdam · NLNewcastle University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual selection in animals has been mostly studied in species in which males are signalers and females are choosers. However, in many species, females are (also) signalers. In species with non-signaling females, virgin females are hypothesized to be less choosy than mated females, as virgins must mate to realize fitness and the number of available males is generally limited. Yet, when females signal to attract males, mate limitation can be overcome. We tested how virgin and mated females differ in their calling behavior, mating latency, and in mate choice, using the tobacco budworm

Indexed as

Chloridea(Heliothis) virescensfemale mate choicefemale sexual behaviormating statusmultiple matingsignaling

Identifiers

PMID35462973
PMCPMC9019137
OpenAlexW4224210360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.