Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35462954›Full record

Article3 Biotech2022

A modified protocol with less clean-up steps increased efficiency and product yield of sequencing library preparation.

Junman Huang, Chenhong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Junman HuangShanghai Universities Key Laboratory of Marine Animal Taxonomy and Evolution, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, 201306 China.
Chenhong LiShanghai Universities Key Laboratory of Marine Animal Taxonomy and Evolution, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, 201306 China.ORCID 0000-0003-3075-1756

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K010611/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Library preparation is an essential step for the next-generation sequencing, such as whole-genome sequencing, reduced-representation genome sequencing, exome sequencing and transcriptome sequencing. The library preparation often involves many steps, including DNA fragmentation, end repair, ligation and amplification. Each step involves different enzymes and buffer systems, so many washing steps are implemented in between to clean-up the enzymes and solutes from the previous step. Those extra washing steps not only are tedious and costly, but more importantly may introduce cross-contamination and reduce the final library yield. Here, we modified the common protocol of Illumina library prep to reduce the washing steps by deactivating the enzymes with high temperature. The modified protocol has two less washing steps than the original one, which can save more than 40 min of hands-on time and reduce potential risk of cross-contamination. We compared our protocol with the original one by constructing libraries using 200 ng DNA of Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-022-03168-5.

Indexed as

Clean-upCost-effectivenessCross-contaminationLibrary prepShort fragments

Identifiers

PMID35462954
PMCPMC8995211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.