Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35462931›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2022

Comparative Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for Septic Shock: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Peiying Huang, Yan Chen, Haobo Zhang, Bojun Chen, Shuai Zhao, Yuchao Feng, Sisi Lei, Qihua Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peiying HuangThe Second Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yan ChenEmergency Department of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Haobo ZhangThe Second Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Bojun ChenThe Second Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Shuai ZhaoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research on Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine, Clinical Research Team of Prevention and Treatment of Cardiac Emergencies with Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yuchao FengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research on Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine, Clinical Research Team of Prevention and Treatment of Cardiac Emergencies with Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Sisi LeiThe Second Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Qihua WuThe Second Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Center for High Pressure Science & Technology Advanced Research · CNGuangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Bayesian network meta-analysisChinese herbal injectionsefficacyseptic shockWestern medicine

Identifiers

PMID35462931
PMCPMC9022100
OpenAlexW4226129911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.