Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35462794›Full record

ArticleSTAR protocols2022

PEM-seq comprehensively quantifies DNA repair outcomes during gene-editing and DSB repair.

Yang Liu, Jianhang Yin, Tingting Gan, Mengzhu Liu, Changchang Xin, Weiwei Zhang, Jiazhi Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in STAR protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Engineered Un1Cas12f1 with boosted gene-editing activity and expanded genomic coverage.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. On- and off-target effects of paired CRISPR-Cas nickase in primary human cells.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yang LiuThe MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Jianhang YinThe MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Tingting GanThe MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Mengzhu LiuThe MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Changchang XinThe MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Weiwei ZhangThe MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Jiazhi HuThe MOE Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, School of Life Sciences, Center for Life Sciences, Genome Editing Research Center, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The repair products of double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) are crucial for investigating the mechanism underlying DNA damage repair as well as evaluating the safety and efficiency of gene-editing; however, a comprehensively quantitative assay remains to be established. Here, we describe the step-by-step instructions of the primer extension-mediated sequencing (PEM-seq), followed by the framework of data processing and statistical analysis. PEM-seq presents a full spectrum of repair outcomes for both genome-editing-induced and endogenous DSBs in mouse and human cells. For complete details on the use and execution of this profile, please refer to Gan et al. (2021), Yin et al. (2019), Liu et al. (2021a), and Zhang et al. (2021).

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedGene EditingAnimalsDNA RepairMiceBioinformaticsCRISPRHigh Throughput ScreeningMolecular BiologySequence analysisSequencing

Identifiers

PMID35462794
PMCPMC9019705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.