Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35462768›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Differences in lower limb muscle activation between global and selective instability devices in single-leg stance in healthy active subjects.

Mariana Sánchez-Barbadora, Alba Cuerda-Del Pino, Javier González-Rosalén, Noemi Moreno-Segura, Adrian Escriche-Escuder, Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mariana Sánchez-BarbadoraPhysiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Alba Cuerda-Del PinoPhysiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Javier González-RosalénPhysiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Noemi Moreno-SeguraPhysiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Adrian Escriche-EscuderPhysiotherapy, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
Rodrigo Martín-San AgustínPhysiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Balance and strength training are frequent strategies to address lower limb injuries, including ankle injuries, which are usually performed in single-leg stance on global instability devices, producing generalized muscular activation of the lower limb. In this context, new specific instability devices arise from the need to selectively work the ankle, specifically the peroneus longus. This study aimed to compare the EMG muscle activation of the peroneus longus, as well as other lower limbs muscles, in a single-leg stance on different balance training devices (BOSU, wobble board, power board, and Blackboard) in standing or squatting positions. Methods: Twenty healthy recreationally trained subjects participated in the study. Subjects performed three repetitions of 15 s (one for familiarization and two for measurement) in standing and squatting positions on the floor, BOSU, wobble board, power board, and Blackboard. Surface electromyography (EMG) was used to record activity of the peroneus longus, soleus, gastrocnemius medialis, tibialis anterior, rectus femoris, and gluteus maximus. Results: The main outcome was that no differences were found for the peroneus longus normalized EMG, neither between devices (

Indexed as

LegLower ExtremityAnkleElectromyographyHumansMuscle, SkeletalAnkleBalanceElectromyographyPeroneus

Identifiers

PMID35462768
PMCPMC9022643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.