ArticlePeerJ2022
Five new mitogenomes sequences of Calidridine sandpipers (Aves: Charadriiformes) and comparative mitogenomics of genus
Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitogenomic architecture and phylogenetic placement ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Selected Lark Mitochondrial Genomes Provide Insights into the Evolution of Second Control Region with Tandem Repeats in Alaudidae (Aves, Passeriformes).Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Structure and Phylogenetic Relationships of Scolopacidae Mitogenomes (Charadriiformes: Scolopacidae).Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Complete mitochondrial genome MK992912 of Great Knot (Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024Article
- Taxonomic Status and Phylogenetic Relationship of the Charadriidae Family Based on Complete Mitogenomes.Current genomics · 2023Article
- The Mitochondrial Genome ofGenes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The genus Methods: Samples were collected from Xiaoyangkou, Rudong County, Jiangsu Province, China. Mitogenomes were sequenced using the Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform for PE 2 × 150 bp sequencing, and then checked for PCR products. Protein-coding genes were determined using an Open Reading Frame Finder. tRNAscan-SE, MITOS, and ARWEN were used to confirm tRNA and rRNA annotations. Bioinformatic analyses were conducted using DnaSP 5.1 and MEGA X. Phylogenic trees were constructed using maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses. Results: We sequenced and annotated the mitogenome of five species and obtained four complete mitogenomes and one nearly complete mitogenome. Circular mitogenomes displayed moderate size variation, with a mean length of 16,747 bp, ranging from 16,642 to 16,791 bp. The mitogenome encoded a control region and a typical set of 37 genes containing two rRNA genes, 13 protein-coding genes, and 22 tRNA genes. There were four start codons, four stop codons, and one incomplete stop codon (T-). The nucleotide composition was consistently AT-biased. The average uncorrected pairwise distances revealed heterogeneity in the evolutionary rate for each gene; the COIII had a slow evolutionary rate, whereas the ATP8 gene had a fast rate. dN/dS analysis indicated that the protein-coding genes were under purifying selection. The genetic distances between species showed that the greatest genetic distance was between
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.