Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35462718›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of microbiology2022

Dynamics of the Bacterial Community's Soil During the In-Situ Degradation Process of Waste Chicken Feathers.

Kun-Tai Li, Yong Yang, Shuai-Wen Zhang, Xin Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kun-Tai Li *College of Food Science and Technology, Guangdong Provincial Key Labotatory of Aquatic Product Processing and Safety, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang, 524088 China.
Yong Yang *University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Food Microbiology, Shanghai, 200093 China.
Shuai-Wen ZhangJiangxi Engineering Laboratory for the Development and Utilization of Agricultural Microbial Resources, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045 China.
Xin ChengJiangxi Engineering Laboratory for the Development and Utilization of Agricultural Microbial Resources, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045 China.ORCID 0000-0003-1738-3522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria play an important role in the biodegradation of feather waste. The exploration of the related microbial community structure and diversity is essential to improve the performance of feather waste treatment processes. In the present work, an in-situ soil sampled from a poultry farm was directly used to simulate and accelerate the natural degradation processes of feather waste under laboratory conditions, in which the dynamics of the microbial communities was further analyzed by Illumina HiSeq high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Biochemical factors, including pH, feather degradation rate and soluble protein content were also determined in this study. The biochemical results showed that the in-situ soil exhibited an effective degradability on chicken feathers, and the degradation rate of feathers reached 57.95 ± 3.09% at 120 h of cultivation. Meanwhile, soluble protein content and pH reached 33.62 ± 1.45 mg/mL 8.99 ± 0.08, respectively. The results of bacterial diversity analysis showed that bacterial community structure and composition significantly varied in each phase of degradation. Additionally, the bacteria system with feather degradability might consist of Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12088-021-00996-6.

Indexed as

Bacteria microbiotaFeather degradationHigh-throughput sequencingIn-situ soilMetabolic pathway

Identifiers

PMID35462718
PMCPMC8980123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.