Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35462673›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of surgical oncology2022

Seeing Is Not Believing: Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring (IONM) in the Thyroid Surgery.

Anuja Deshmukh, Anand Ebin Thomas, Harsh Dhar, Parthiban Velayutham, Gouri Pantvaidya, Prathamesh Pai, Devendra Chaukar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anuja DeshmukhDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India.
Anand Ebin ThomasDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Malabar Cancer Centre, Thalassery, Kerala 670103 India.
Harsh DharDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Narayana Superspeciality Hospital-Cancer Institute, Howrah, West Bengal 711109 India.
Parthiban VelayuthamDivision of Neurosurgery-Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India.
Gouri PantvaidyaDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India.
Prathamesh PaiDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India.
Devendra ChaukarDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring the integrity of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN), the external branch of superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN) and preservation of normal voice are the prime 'functional' goals of thyroid surgery. More in-depth knowledge of neuronal mechanisms has revealed that anatomical integrity does not always translate into functional integrity. Despite meticulous dissection, neural injuries are not always predictable or visually evident. Intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) is designed to aid in nerve identification and early detection of functional impairment. With the evolution of technique, intermittent monitoring has given way to continuous-IONM. Over the years, IONM gathered both support and flak. Despite numerous randomised studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, there still prevails a state of clinical equipoise concerning the utility of IONM and its cost-effectiveness. This article inspects the true usefulness of IONM, elaborates on the optimal way to practice it, and presents a critical literature review.

Indexed as

Intraoperative nerve monitoringIONMIONM reviewThyroid surgery

Identifiers

PMID35462673
PMCPMC8986933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.