Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35462589›Full record

SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2023

Indications for surgical fixation of low-energy pelvic ring fractures in elderly: a systematic review.

R A Timmer, S M Verhage, P Krijnen, S A G Meylaerts, I B Schipper

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Operative versus non-operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: retrospective evaluation of one-year mortality and in-hospital complications.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Letter of rebuttal to 'Comment on: Imaging of pelvic ring fractures in older adults and its clinical implications-a systematic review'.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R A TimmerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. R.A.Timmer@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1593-6293
S M VerhageDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
P KrijnenDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
S A G MeylaertsDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
I B SchipperDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere are no generally accepted criteria for when and how to fixate osteoporotic pelvic ring fractures in elderly. This systemic review aims to summarize the currently available literature regarding the indications and methods for surgical fixation of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring in elderly patients after low-energy trauma. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe Pubmed and Embase databases were searched using the key words pelvic fractures, geriatric, fragility, osteoporosis, and surgical fixation, and their synonyms. Extracted data including the indication, method of operative fixation, and post-operative outcomes (pain levels, mobility, complications and mortality) were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The studies were too heterogeneous to perform a meta-analysis.

resultsEleven cohort studies (3 comparative and 8 noncomparative) were included. The methodological quality was poor to moderate; the studies were heterogeneous regarding study design and reported outcomes. In all included studies operative treatment for all fracture types was preceded by a period of conservative treatment comprising physiotherapy-guided full weight-bearing. Time to surgery differed widely. For posterior ring fixation, the majority of the included studies used minimally invasive surgery with trans-iliosacral screws. Five studies described a form of additional fixation of the anterior pelvic ring but did not report the indications.

conclusionsFixation of low-energy pelvic ring fractures in elderly is commonly performed after a period of conservative treatment, with persistent pain as the most frequent indication for fixation. Fracture classification based on stability seems to be of secondary importance. Timing for surgical fixation of the pelvic ring fracture in elderly patients remains diverse. Large well-designed comparative prospective studies and randomized controlled trials are needed to provide clearly substantiated guidelines.

Indexed as

Fractures, BonePelvic BonesAgedBone ScrewsFracture Fixation, InternalHumansPainProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesFragilityGeriatricIndicationOsteoporosisPelvic fracturesSurgical fixation

Identifiers

PMID35462589
PMCPMC10110636
OpenAlexW4224325510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.