Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35462564›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2022

Central and peripheral delivered AAV9-SMN are both efficient but target different pathomechanisms in a mouse model of spinal muscular atrophy.

Aoife Reilly, Marc-Olivier Deguise, Ariane Beauvais, Rebecca Yaworski, Simon Thebault, Daniel R Tessier, Vincent Tabard-Cossa, Niko Hensel, Bernard L Schneider, Rashmi Kothary

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spinal muscular atrophy: Biology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic advances.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Peripheral defects precede neuromuscular pathology in theJournal of neuromuscular diseases · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Aoife ReillyRegenerative Medicine Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Marc-Olivier DeguiseRegenerative Medicine Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3802-1195
Ariane BeauvaisRegenerative Medicine Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Rebecca YaworskiRegenerative Medicine Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Simon ThebaultDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
Daniel R TessierDepartment of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Vincent Tabard-CossaDepartment of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4375-717X
Niko HenselRegenerative Medicine Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Bernard L SchneiderBrain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5485-8748
Rashmi KotharyRegenerative Medicine Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada. rkothary@ohri.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9239-7310
University of Ottawa · CAOttawa Hospital · CAÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disease caused by loss of the SMN1 gene and low SMN protein levels. Although lower motor neurons are a primary target, there is evidence that peripheral organ defects contribute to SMA. Current SMA gene therapy and clinical trials use a single intravenous bolus of the blood-brain-barrier penetrant scAAV9-cba-SMN by either systemic or central nervous system (CNS) delivery, resulting in impressive amelioration of the clinical phenotype but not a complete cure. The impact of scAAV9-cba-SMN treatment regimens on the CNS as well as on specific peripheral organs is yet to be described in a comparative manner. Therefore, we injected SMA mice with scAAV9-cba-SMN either intravenously (IV) for peripheral SMN restoration or intracerebroventricularly (ICV) for CNS-focused SMN restoration. In our system, ICV injections increased SMN in peripheral organs and the CNS while IV administration increased SMN in peripheral tissues only, largely omitting the CNS. Both treatments rescued several peripheral phenotypes while only ICV injections were neuroprotective. Surprisingly, both delivery routes resulted in a robust rescue effect on survival, weight, and motor function, which in IV-treated mice relied on peripheral SMN restoration but not on targeting the motor neurons. This demonstrates the independent contribution of peripheral organs to SMA pathology and suggests that treatments should not be restricted to motor neurons.

Indexed as

DependovirusMuscular Atrophy, SpinalAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsMiceMotor NeuronsSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 ProteinSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 Protein

Identifiers

PMID35462564
OpenAlexW4224315490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.