ArticleNephron2022
Effect of Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate on Serum Potassium and Bicarbonate in Patients with Hyperkalemia and Metabolic Acidosis Associated with Chronic Kidney Disease: Rationale and Design of the NEUTRALIZE Study.
Article in Nephron, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ionomic profiling of vitreous humor and serum in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Effectiveness, safety, and treatment pattern of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate in Chinese patients with hyperkalemia: interim analysis from a multicenter, prospective, real-world study (Actualize Study).Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- The relationship between IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-6 cytokines, and severity of the condition with serum zinc and Fe in children infected withOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Compared effectiveness of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate and calcium polystyrene sulfonate on hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) is a selective potassium (K+) binder for hyperkalemia management that provides rapid and sustained correction of hyperkalemia. The NEUTRALIZE study is investigating whether SZC, in addition to correcting hyperkalemia and maintaining normal serum K+, can provide sustained increases in serum bicarbonate (HCO3-) in patients with hyperkalemia and metabolic acidosis associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
methodsThis is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3b study of US adults with stage 3-5 CKD not on dialysis with hyperkalemia (K+ >5.0-≤5.9 mmol/L) and low-serum HCO3- (16-20 mmol/L). In the open-label correction phase, all eligible patients receive SZC 10 g three times daily for up to 48 h. Patients who achieve normokalemia (K+ ≥3.5-≤5.0 mmol/L) are then randomized 1:1 to once-daily SZC 10 g or placebo for a 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled maintenance phase. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with normokalemia at the end of treatment (EOT) without rescue therapy for hyperkalemia. Key secondary endpoints include mean change in serum HCO3-, the proportion of patients with an increase in serum HCO3- of ≥2 or ≥3 mmol/L without rescue therapy for metabolic acidosis, and the proportion of patients with serum HCO3- ≥22 mmol/L at EOT.
conclusionsNEUTRALIZE will establish whether SZC can provide sustained increases in serum HCO3- while lowering serum K+ in patients with hyperkalemia and CKD-associated metabolic acidosis and may provide insights on the mechanism(s) underlying the increased serum HCO3- with SZC treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.