Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35462285›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis2022

Validation and application of a quantitative liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay for the analysis of rifapentine and 25-O-desacetyl rifapentine in human milk.

Buyisile Mkhize, Tracy Kellermann, Jennifer Norman, Sandra Castel, Anton Joubert, Marthinus van der Merwe, Kelly E Dooley, Jyoti S Mathad, Lubbe Wiesner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Application of a kosmotrope (NaAnalytical science advances · 2024
    Article
  3. Best practices for the care of pregnant people living with TB.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Buyisile MkhizeDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Tracy KellermannDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jennifer NormanDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Sandra CastelDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Anton JoubertDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Marthinus van der MerweDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kelly E DooleyDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jyoti S MathadDepartment of Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Global Health, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Lubbe WiesnerDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Electronic address: lubbe.wiesner@uct.ac.za.
University of Cape Town · ZAJohns Hopkins University · USWeill Cornell Medicine · US

Funding

LOC-IMPAACT Leadership GroupPharmacokinetics and Safety of Remdesivir for Treatment of COVID-19 in Pregnant Women in the USUM1AI068632 · NIAID · SOCIAL AND SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS, INC. · PI Sharon A Nachman · 2011 to 2026
$278.1M
Statistical and Data Management Center-Pediatric,Adolescent, and Maternal CTGUM1AI068616 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Sean Scott Brummel, Marlene Ann Cooper · 2011 to 2026
$155.6M
LC - IMPAACT Leadership GroupUM1AI106716 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Grace M Aldrovandi · 2014 to 2026
$47.2M
Mentoring Investigators in HIV and Tuberculosis Therapeutics ResearchK24AI150349 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DOOLEY, KELLY E. · 2020 to 2025
$789k
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI150349NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068616NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068632NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI106716NICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201800001CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201800001I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A robust analytical method based on liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry was developed and validated to quantify rifapentine and 25-O-desacetyl rifapentine in human breast milk to aid in determining the breastfed infant risk to the excreted drug in human milk. Samples were extracted by a combination of protein precipitation and solid phase extraction using rifampicin-d3 as an internal standard. An Agilent® Poroshell 120 EC-C18 (4.6 mm × 50 mm, 2.7 µm) column was used for chromatographic separation employing an isocratic mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile: methanol: 0.1% formic acid (55/5/40, v/v/v) at a flow rate of 450 µL/min, and with a total run time of four minutes. Mass detection was on an AB Sciex API 4000 mass spectrometer using electrospray ionization in the positive mode and based on multiple reaction monitoring data acquisition. Rifapentine was accurately quantified across a concentration range of 2.00-2000 ng/mL and 25-O-desacetyl rifapentine from 4.00 to 2000 ng/mL. During validation, the inter- and intra-day accuracy and precision at the tested QC concentrations (N = 18) for rifapentine were between 97.4% and 100.6%, and 3.1% and 8.3%, respectively. The inter- and intra-day accuracy and precision for 25-O-desacetyl rifapentine were between 96.4% and 106.3%, and 6.7% and 11.8%, respectively. No significant matrix effects were observed, and the method was shown to be specific for rifapentine and 25-O-desacetyl rifapentine. Human milk samples (N = 22) generated during a phase I/II clinical trial were successfully analysed for rifapentine and 25-O-desacetyl rifapentine using this validated method. Concentrations for rifapentine and 25-O-desacetyl rifapentine in human milk samples (N = 22) ranged from 11.2-1180 ng/mL and 7.11-573 ng/mL, respectively.

Indexed as

Milk, HumanTandem Mass SpectrometryChromatography, High Pressure LiquidChromatography, LiquidFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsRifampinSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationRifampinrifapentineHuman milkLiquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometryRifapentineTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID35462285
PMCPMC9871952
OpenAlexW4224082709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.