Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35461958›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2022

Association of prenatal substance use with prenatal and postpartum care: Evidence from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2016-2019.

Elizabeth Simmons, Anna E Austin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prevalence of psychosocial issues among pregnant women who do and do not use illicit substances.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth SimmonsThe Department of Maternal and Child Health, the Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Carolina Population Center, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: lizzysim@unc.edu.
Anna E AustinThe Department of Maternal and Child Health, the Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Injury Prevention Research Center, UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

POPULATION STUDIEST32HD007168 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELIZABETH A FRANKENBERG · 1985 to 2026
$13.8M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to build on existing qualitative research to estimate the association of prenatal substance use with prenatal and postpartum care. We used data from the 2016-2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System for 9 states. We conducted adjusted linear regression to compare month of gestation of first prenatal visit and adjusted logistic regression to compare receipt of adequate prenatal care and a postpartum healthcare visit among women who reported prenatal use of any opioids, prescription opioids, marijuana, and illicit drugs to those who did not report use of each substance. Women who reported prenatal use of any opioids (Risk Difference(RD) = 0.16; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 0.04, 0.28), prescription opioids (RD = 0.16; 95% CI = 0.04, 0.28), marijuana (RD = 0.25; 95% CI = 0.10, 0.41) and illicit drugs (RD = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.09, 0.95) initiated prenatal care later than those who did not report use of each substance. Women who reported prenatal use of any opioid (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.68, 1.00), prescription opioids (OR = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.69, 1.02), marijuana (OR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.48, 0.73) and illicit drugs (OR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.20, 0.42) were less likely to receive adequate prenatal care. Women who reported prenatal use of any opioid (OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.65, 1.04), prescription opioids (OR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.66, 1.05), marijuana (OR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.51, 0.82) and illicit drugs (OR = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.30, 0.72) had a lower likelihood of a postpartum visit than those who did not report use of each substance. Results indicate potential intervention points for pregnant women who use substances.

Indexed as

CannabisIllicit DrugsSubstance-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansPostnatal CarePregnancyPrenatal CareRisk AssessmentAnalgesics, OpioidIllicit DrugsIntrapartum carePostpartum carePrenatal careSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID35461958
PMCPMC10018998
OpenAlexW4224252443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.