ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022
Optimal delivery time for patients with diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus: a single-center real-world study.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differences in umbilical cord blood gas parameters between women with and without gestational diabetes: a single-center prospective-retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Gestational diabetes mellitus: The optimal time of delivery.World journal of diabetes · 2023Review
- High glucose induced HIF-1α/TREK1 expression and myometrium relaxation during pregnancy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo determine the optimal delivery time for women with diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus by comparing differences in adverse maternal-fetal outcome and cesarean section rates.
methodsThis real-world retrospective study included 1,050 patients with diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus who delivered at 35-42 weeks' gestation. Data on patient characteristics, maternal-fetal outcomes, and cesarean section rate based on fetal gestational age were collected and analyzed. Differences between deliveries with and without iatrogenic intervention were also analyzed.
resultsThe cesarean section rate at ≥ 41 weeks' gestation was significantly higher than that at 39-39 + 6 weeks (56% vs. 39%, p = 0.031). There were no significant differences in multiple adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes at delivery before and after 39 weeks. Vaginal delivery rates were increased significantly at 39-39 + 6 weeks due to iatrogenic intervention (p = 0.005) and 40-40 + 6 weeks (p = 0.003) in patients without and with spontaneous uterine contractions, respectively.
conclusionsIt's recommended that optimal delivery time for patients with diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus should be between 39- and 40 + 6 weeks' gestation. Patients who have Bishop scores higher than 4 can undergo iatrogenic intervention at 39-39 + 6 weeks. However iatrogenic interventions are not recommended for patients with low Bishop scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.