Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35461229›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Scale-out of a Total Worker Health® approach for designing interventions to reduce teacher stress: pilot implementation evaluation.

Lisa M H Sanetti, Alexandra M Pierce, Lauren Gammie, Alicia G Dugan, Jennifer M Cavallari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisa M H SanettiNeag School of Education, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA. lisa.sanetti@uconn.edu.
Alexandra M PierceNeag School of Education, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.
Lauren GammieNeag School of Education, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.
Alicia G DuganSchool of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.
Jennifer M CavallariSchool of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.
University of Connecticut · USUConn Health · US

Funding

CPH-NEW IV - Total Worker HealthU19OH012299 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI CAVALLARI, JENNIFER M · 2021 to 2025
$6.9M
NIOSH CDC HHS U19 OH012299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTeachers have high rates of daily stress and the majority of available interventions are focused at the teacher-level. Yet, best practices in Total Worker Health® approaches indicate organization-level interventions identified using a participatory approach are most effective. We conducted an exploratory scale-out pilot study to examine the adoption of the Healthy Workplace Participatory Program (HWPP), an evidence-based, Total Worker Health approach to engage employees (e.g., teachers) and supervisory personnel (e.g., administrators) in the design and implementation of workplace well-being interventions within two elementary schools.

methodsWe evaluated the program both quantitatively and qualitatively collecting implementation outcome data (i.e., fidelity, acceptability, understanding, feasibility, system alignment) as well as data-driven adaptations using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded. Data from the first school informed scale-out adaptation of the HWPP intervention, HWPP-Education, within the second school. We compared implementation outcomes between Pilot Schools 1 and 2 to evaluate improvements in the adapted HWPP.

resultsAdaptations to HWPP program content and process were suggested to increase feasibility and contextual fit. Acceptability, understanding, and feasibility ratings showed statistically significant improvements comparing School 1 to School 2 which implemented the improved HWPP-Education. Furthermore, users reported adaptations including shorter meeting design and faster process were feasible within their work context.

conclusionThis pilot study is the first attempt to scale out the HWPP to educators, and while not intended to confirm efficacy, it showed promising results for scale-out. Results from Pilot Schools 1 and 2 suggest systematic use of quantitative and qualitative implementation data can effectively inform scale-out efforts that increase critical outcomes such as fidelity, acceptability, understanding, feasibility, system alignment, and leader engagement as well as decrease the extent of system resources needed. As such, this scale-out process may be a feasible approach on which to base large-scale implementation efforts of the HWPP among educators.

Indexed as

Health PromotionSchoolsHealth EducationHumansPilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationWorkplaceFidelityScale-outTeacher well-beingTotal Worker Health®

Identifiers

PMID35461229
PMCPMC9034693
OpenAlexW4224301304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.