Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35461100›Full record

ArticleWater research2022

Regional patterns and drivers of total nitrogen trends in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: Insights from machine learning approaches and management implications.

Qian Zhang, Joel T Bostic, Robert D Sabo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qian ZhangUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, MD 21403, USA. Electronic address: qzhang@chesapeakebay.net.
Joel T BosticUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Appalachian Laboratory, Frostburg, MD 21532, USA.
Robert D SaboU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C. 20004, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic nutrient inputs have led to nutrient enrichment in many waterbodies worldwide, including Chesapeake Bay (USA). River water quality integrates the spatial and temporal changes of watersheds and forms the foundation for disentangling the effects of anthropogenic inputs. We demonstrate with the Chesapeake Bay Non-Tidal Monitoring Network that machine learning approaches - i.e., hierarchical clustering and random forest (RF) classification - can be combined to better understand the regional patterns and drivers of total nitrogen (TN) trends in large monitoring networks, resulting in information useful for watershed management. Cluster analysis revealed regional patterns of short-term TN trends (2007-2018) and categorized the stations into three distinct trend clusters, namely, V-shape (n = 23), monotonic decline (n = 35), and monotonic increase (n = 26). RF models identified regional drivers of TN trend clusters by quantifying the effects of watershed characteristics (land use, geology, physiography) and major N sources on the trend clusters. Results provide encouraging evidence that improved agricultural nutrient management has resulted in declines in agricultural nonpoint sources, which in turn contributed to water-quality improvement in our period of analysis. Moreover, water-quality improvements are more likely in watersheds underlain by carbonate rocks, reflecting the relatively quick groundwater transport of this terrain. By contrast, water-quality improvements are less likely in Coastal Plain watersheds, reflecting the effect of legacy N in groundwater. Notably, results show degrading trends in forested watersheds, suggesting new and/or remobilized sources that may compromise management efforts. Finally, the developed RF models were used to predict TN trend clusters for the entire Chesapeake Bay watershed at the fine scale of river segments (n = 979), providing fine spatial information that can facilitate targeted watershed management, including unmonitored areas. More broadly, this combined use of clustering and classification approaches can be applied to other regional monitoring networks to address similar water-quality questions.

Indexed as

BaysNitrogenEnvironmental MonitoringMachine LearningRiversNitrogenAnthropogenic sourcesCluster analysisMonitoring networkRandom forestWater qualityWatershed management

Identifiers

PMID35461100
PMCPMC9743807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.