Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35461083›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2022

Naloxone administration among opioid-involved overdose deaths in 38 United States jurisdictions in the State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System, 2019.

Kelly Quinn, Sagar Kumar, Calli T Hunter, Julie O'Donnell, Nicole L Davis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Overdose Alert and Response Technologies: State-of-the-art Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly QuinnCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Overdose Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. Electronic address: jpe8@cdc.gov.
Sagar KumarCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Overdose Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. Electronic address: non3@cdc.gov.
Calli T HunterCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Overdose Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. Electronic address: nqz9@cdc.gov.
Julie O'DonnellCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Overdose Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. Electronic address: irh8@cdc.gov.
Nicole L DavisCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Overdose Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. Electronic address: dwg4@cdc.gov.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of drug overdose deaths in the United States involve opioids, and synthetic opioid-involved overdose death rates are increasing. Naloxone is a key prevention strategy yet estimates of its administration are limited.

methodsWe analyzed 2019 data from 37 states and the District of Columbia in CDC's State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System to estimate the percentage of decedents, by sociodemographic subgroup, who experienced a fatal opioid-involved overdose and had no evidence of naloxone administration.

resultsA total of 77.3% of 33,084 opioid-involved overdose deaths had no evidence of naloxone administration. Statistically significant subgroup differences were observed for all sociodemographic groups examined except housing status. The highest percentages of decedents lacking evidence of naloxone administration were those with highest educational attainment (doctorate or professional degree, 87.0%), oldest (55-64 years, 83.4%; ≥65 years, 87.3%) and youngest ages (<15 years, 87.5%), and single marital status (84.5%). The lowest percentages of no evidence of naloxone administration were observed for non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaskan Native persons (66.2%) and those ages 15-24 years (70.8%).

conclusionsMore than three-quarters of opioid-involved overdose deaths had no evidence of naloxone administration, underscoring the need to ensure sufficient naloxone access and capacity for utilization. While fatal overdose data cannot fully characterize sociodemographic disparities in naloxone administration, naloxone education and access efforts can be informed by apparent inequities. Public health partners can assist persons who use drugs (PWUD) by maintaining naloxone supply and amplifying messages about the high risk of using drugs alone among PWUD and their social networks.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseOpiate OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersAdolescentAdultAnalgesics, OpioidDistrict of ColumbiaHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsUnited StatesYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsHarm reductionHealth disparitiesNaloxoneOpioid-involved overdoseOverdose mortality

Identifiers

PMID35461083
PMCPMC9106898
OpenAlexW4223906904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.