Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35460517›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2022

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on care delivery and quality of life in lung cancer surgery.

Dede K Teteh, Jovani Barajas, Betty Ferrell, Ziaoke Zhou, Loretta Erhunmwunsee, Dan J Raz, Jae Y Kim, Virginia Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The safety and acceptability of using telehealth for follow-up of patients following cancer surgery: A systematic review.European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Understanding the experiences of lung cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dede K TetehDepartment of Health Sciences, Crean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, Orange, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9552-148X
Jovani BarajasDivision of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Betty FerrellDivision of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Ziaoke ZhouDivision of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Loretta ErhunmwunseeDepartment of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Dan J RazDepartment of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Jae Y KimDepartment of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Virginia SunDivision of Nursing Research and Education, Department of Population Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.

Funding

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health Domains on Lung Cancer Surgery Family Caregivers and PatientsR01CA217841 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI KIM, JAE, SUN, VIRGINIA CHIH-YI · 2018 to 2022
$3.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA217841The Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI 1R01CA217841-01A1The Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI 3R01CA217841-03S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (COVID-19) pandemic and associated restrictions have altered the delivery of surgical care. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of COVID-19 on care delivery and quality of life (QOL) from the perspectives of lung cancer surgery patients, family caregivers (FCGs), and thoracic surgery teams.

methodsPatients/FCGs enrolled in a randomized trial of a self-management intervention for lung cancer surgery preparation/recovery were invited to participate in this qualitative study. Patients/FCGs data were collected separately 1-month postdischarge. Interviews were also conducted with thoracic surgery team members. Content analysis approaches were used to develop themes.

resultsForty-one respondents including 19 patients, 18 FCGs, three thoracic surgeons, and one nurse practitioner participated in the study. Patient themes included isolation, psychological distress, delayed/impacted care, and financial impact. FCGs themes included caregiving challenges, worry about COVID-19, financial hardship, isolation, and physical activity limitations. Surgical team themes included witnessing patient/FCG's distress, challenges with telehealth, communication/educational challenges, and delays in treatment.

conclusionsCOVID-19 had a varied impact on care delivery and QOL for lung cancer surgery dyads. Some dyads reported minimal impact, while others experienced added psychological distress, isolation, and caregiving challenges. Surgical teams also experienced challenges in the approach used to provide care.

Indexed as

COVID-19Lung NeoplasmsAftercareHumansPandemicsPatient DischargeQuality of Lifefamily caregiversisolationpatientsquality of lifetelehealththoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID35460517
PMCPMC9088468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.