Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35460491›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2022

Clinical re-biopsy of segmental gains-the primary source of preimplantation genetic testing false positives.

Steve Grkovic, Maria V Traversa, Mark Livingstone, Steven J McArthur

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steve GrkovicGenea, 321 Kent Street, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, Australia. steve.grkovic@genea.com.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8449-7365
Maria V TraversaGenea, 321 Kent Street, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, Australia.
Mark LivingstoneGenea, 321 Kent Street, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, Australia.
Steven J McArthurGenea, 321 Kent Street, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, Australia.
Genedata (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDoes re-biopsy of blastocysts classified as abnormal (ABN) due to segmental aneuploidy (SA) have clinical utility?

methodsThe live birth (LB) outcomes of mosaic SAs, compared to other categories, were determined after transfer of 3084 PGT-A tested blastocysts. An initial 12-month trial thawed 111 blastocysts classified as ABN due to a SA for clinical re-biopsy, with an additional 58 from a subsequent 16-month revised protocol. Where re-biopsy failed to corroborate the original classification, blastocysts were reported as mosaic and suitable for clinical use.

resultsSegmental mosaics had a LB rate (54.1%) which was indistinguishable from that of euploid (53.7%). Numeric mosaics had statistically significant (P < 0.05) reduced LB rates compared to euploid, with high-level numerics (19.2%) also exhibiting a significant reduction compared to low level (42.3%). Of the initial 111 blastocysts with SAs, 85 could be re-biopsied. Segmental gains became suitable for re-biopsy at a high rate (90.9%), with 84.2% (16/19) of these reclassified as mosaic. Only 73.0% of deletions and complex changes were suitable for re-biopsy, of which 73.0% (46/63) were confirmed ABN. The subsequent 16-month period primarily focused on gains, confirming the high rate at which they can be reclassified as clinically useable.

conclusionsBlastocysts harboring mosaic segmental duplications, rather than SAs in general, are the primary source of false-positive PGT-A results and represent a category with a LB rate similar to that of euploid. A high degree of confidence in the reliability of PGT-A results can be maintained by performing confirmatory clinical TE biopsies.

Indexed as

Preimplantation DiagnosisAneuploidyBiopsyBlastocystFemaleGenetic TestingHumansPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsClinical re-biopsyFalse positivesMosaicismPreimplantation genetic testingSegmental aneuploidy

Identifiers

PMID35460491
PMCPMC9174409
OpenAlexW4224270258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.