Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35460472›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2023

The use of respiratory muscle training in patients with pulmonary dysfunction, internal diseases or central nervous system disorders: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Luisa Cacciante, Andrea Turolla, Giorgia Pregnolato, Sara Federico, Francesca Baldan, Anna Rutkowska, Sebastian Rutkowski

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Luisa CaccianteLaboratory of Rehabilitation Technologies, Hospital San Camillo IRCCS, Venice, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8662-9253
Andrea TurollaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater University of Bologna, via Massarenti, 9, Bologna, Italy. andrea.turolla@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1609-8060
Giorgia PregnolatoLaboratory of Rehabilitation Technologies, Hospital San Camillo IRCCS, Venice, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4622-6393
Sara FedericoLaboratory of Rehabilitation Technologies, Hospital San Camillo IRCCS, Venice, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4891-5755
Francesca BaldanLaboratory of Rehabilitation Technologies, Hospital San Camillo IRCCS, Venice, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7194-5819
Anna RutkowskaFaculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2456-8499
Sebastian RutkowskiFaculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, Opole, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8504-0129
IRCCS San Camillo Hospital · ITOpole University of Technology · PLIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · IT

Funding

European Respiratory Society ERS LTRF202001-00746)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of RMT in internal and central nervous system disorders, on pulmonary function, exercise capacity and quality of life.

methodsThe inclusion criteria were (1) publications designed as Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT), with (2) participants being adults with pulmonary dysfunction caused by an internal disease or central nervous system disorder, (3) an intervention defined as RMT (either IMT or EMT) and (4) with the assessment of exercise capacity, respiratory function and quality of life. For the methodological quality assessment of risk of bias, likewise statistical analysis and meta-analysis the RevMan version 5.3 software and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool were used. Two authors independently analysed the following databases for relevant research articles: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase.

resultsFrom a total of 2200 records, the systematic review includes 29 RCT with an overall sample size of 1155 patients. Results suggest that patients with internal and central nervous system disorders who underwent RMT had better quality of life and improved significantly their performance in exercise capacity and in respiratory function assessed with FVC and MIP when compared to control conditions (i.e. no intervention, sham training, placebo or conventional treatments).

conclusionRespiratory muscle training seems to be more effective than control conditions (i.e. no intervention, sham training, placebo or conventional treatment), in patients with pulmonary dysfunction due to internal and central nervous system disorders, for quality of life, exercise capacity and respiratory function assessed with MIP and FVC, but not with FEV1.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System DiseasesQuality of LifeAdultBreathing ExercisesHumansDyspnoeaPulmonary dysfunctionQuality of lifeRespiratory functionRespiratory muscle training (RMT)

Identifiers

PMID35460472
PMCPMC9034447
OpenAlexW4224321112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.