Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35460409›Full record

SynthesisAge and ageing2022

New horizons in evidence-based care for older people: individual participant data meta-analysis.

Andrew Clegg, Karen Bandeen-Roche, Amanda Farrin, Anne Forster, Thomas M Gill, John Gladman, Ngaire Kerse, Richard Lindley, Richard J McManus, Rene Melis and 6 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Age and ageing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Data resource profile: the virtual international care homes trials archive (VICHTA).International journal of population data science · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Andrew CleggAcademic Unit for Ageing & Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Karen Bandeen-RocheDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Amanda FarrinLeeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Anne ForsterAcademic Unit for Ageing & Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Thomas M GillYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
John GladmanUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ngaire KerseDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland School of Population Health, Auckland, New Zealand.
Richard LindleySydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Richard J McManusNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rene MelisRadboud UMC, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Ruben Mujica-MotaAcademic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Parminder RainaDepartment of Health Evidence and Impact & McMaster Institute for Research on Aging, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Kenneth RockwoodDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Ruth TehDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland School of Population Health, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7135-1850
Danielle van der WindtSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Miles WithamAGE Research Group, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Lauren Ferrante · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Technological Assessment and Solutions Core - RC4P30AG021334 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jeremy D Walston · 2003 to 2026
$33.2M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066507 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Corinne Pettigrew · 2020 to 2026
$29.3M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021334NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-based decisions on clinical and cost-effectiveness of interventions are ideally informed by meta-analyses of intervention trial data. However, when undertaken, such meta-analyses in ageing research have typically been conducted using standard methods whereby summary (aggregate) data are extracted from published trial reports. Although meta-analysis of aggregate data can provide useful insights into the average effect of interventions within a selected trial population, it has limitations regarding robust conclusions on which subgroups of people stand to gain the greatest benefit from an intervention or are at risk of experiencing harm. Future evidence synthesis using individual participant data from ageing research trials for meta-analysis could transform understanding of the effectiveness of interventions for older people, supporting evidence-based and sustainable commissioning. A major advantage of individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) is that it enables examination of characteristics that predict treatment effects, such as frailty, disability, cognitive impairment, ethnicity, gender and other wider determinants of health. Key challenges of IPDMA relate to the complexity and resources needed for obtaining, managing and preparing datasets, requiring a meticulous approach involving experienced researchers, frequently with expertise in designing and analysing clinical trials. In anticipation of future IPDMA work in ageing research, we are establishing an international Ageing Research Trialists collective, to bring together trialists with a common focus on transforming care for older people as a shared ambition across nations.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineResearch DesignAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansageingfrailtyindividual participant datameta-analysisolder peoplestratified care

Identifiers

PMID35460409
PMCPMC9034697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.