ArticleNeurogenetics2022
A novel nonsense variant in EXOC8 underlies a neurodevelopmental disorder.
Article in Neurogenetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulation of yeast polarized exocytosis by phosphoinositide lipids.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024Review
- Article
- The exocyst complex in neurological disorders.Human genetics · 2023Review
- The diagnostic yield, candidate genes, and pitfalls for a genetic study of intellectual disability in 118 middle eastern families.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human exocyst complex is an evolutionary conserved multimeric complex composed of proteins encoded by eight genes EXOC1-EXOC8. It is known that the exocyst complex plays a role in ciliogenesis, cytokinesis, cell migration, autophagy, and fusion of secretory vesicles. Recently, loss of function variants in EXOC7 and EXOC8 has been associated with abnormalities of cerebral cortical development leading to a neurodevelopmental phenotype. Neurodevelopmental disorders are a huge group of clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorders. In the present study, we recruited a large consanguineous family segregating a neurodevelopmental disorder in an autosomal recessive form. We performed clinical phenotyping by imaging the patient's brain followed by whole exome sequencing examining DNA from two affected individuals. The clinical phenotypes of the disease were suggestive of brain atrophy. Clinical examination revealed intellectual impairment with hypertonia and brisk reflexes. WES followed by Sanger sequencing revealed a novel homozygous nonsense mutation [EXOC8; NM_175876.5; c.1714G > T; p.(Glu572Ter)] in the DNA of affected individuals. Both parents of the patients were heterozygous for the identified mutation. All the pathogenicity prediction softwares predicted the identified variant as disease causing. This study reports a second protein-truncating variant in EXOC8. The findings confirm that loss of function variants in EXOC8 underlies a neurodevelopmental disorder. The identification of a protein-truncating variant in EXOC8 in the current study can be helpful in establishing genotype-phenotype correlations. Our results also provide new insights into genetic counseling and clinical management for the affected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.