Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35460359›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2022

Effect of nitrate supplementation on skeletal muscle motor unit activity during isometric blood flow restriction exercise.

Ozcan Esen, Azmy Faisal, Fabio Zambolin, Stephen J Bailey, Michael J Callaghan

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ozcan EsenDepartment of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M15 6GX, UK. Ozcan.esen@mmu.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3559-2854
Azmy FaisalDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Fabio ZambolinDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Stephen J BaileySchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
Michael J CallaghanDepartment of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M15 6GX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-2838
Manchester Metropolitan University · GBLoughborough University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNitrate (NO PURPOSE: To assess the effect of NO

methodsSixteen healthy active young adults (six females) completed two trials in a randomized, double-blind, crossover design. Trials were preceded by 5 days of either NO

resultsPlasma nitrite (NO

conclusionsThese findings provide insight into the effect of NO

Indexed as

Blood Flow Restriction TherapyNitratesCross-Over StudiesDietary SupplementsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIsometric ContractionMuscle, SkeletalPolyestersYoung AdultNitratesPolyestersBeetroot juiceElectromyographyMuscle functionNeuromuscular functionNitric oxide

Identifiers

PMID35460359
PMCPMC9197866
OpenAlexW4224255659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.