ArticleExperimental brain research2022
Non-local muscle fatigue is mediated at spinal and supraspinal levels.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of repeated unihemispheric concurrent dual-site tDCS and virtual reality games on motor coordination of sedentary adolescent girls.Behavioral and brain functions : BBF · 2024Trial
- Effect of tDCS targeting the M1 or left DLPFC on physical performance, psychophysiological responses, and cognitive function in repeated all-out cycling: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Trial
- Non-local Muscle Fatigue in Young and Middle-Aged Women following Fast-Paced Walking.International journal of exercise science · 2026Article
- Finger tapping at maximal speed evokes crossover fatigability in the other hand.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Cervicomedullary motor evoked responses in individuals with severe chronic hemiparesis post-stroke: a feasibility study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective was to measure the corticospinal excitability and motoneuron responsiveness of the right and left Biceps Brachii (BB), and left Abductor Digiti Minimi (ADM) muscles in response to submaximal isotonic fatiguing contractions performed by the right BB muscle. With the familiarization session, ten young moderately active male subjects came to the lab on seven occasions. Three sets of 3 min seated elbow curls at 25% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) separated by a 1-min rest performed by the right BB muscle were used as the fatiguing protocol. The motor evoked potential (MEP), cervicomedullary motor evoked potential (CMEP), and compound muscle action potential (Mmax) of the right BB muscle (baseline and after each set of the fatiguing task), the left BB and ADM muscles (baseline, post-fatigue, post-10, and post-20 min) were measured. MEP and CMEP were then normalized to Mmax for statistical analysis. The results showed that in the right BB muscle, there was a significant reduction in the MEP after performing the fatiguing task (p= 0.03), while no significant effect of time was seen in the CMEP (p= 0.07). In the left BB muscle, the MEP significantly decreased from pre-fatigue to post-fatigue (p= 0.01) and post-10 (p= 0.001), while there was a significant decline in the CMEP post-fatigue (p= 0.03). In the left ADM muscle, MEP significantly decreased post-fatigue (p= 0.03) and no changes were seen in the CMEP (p= 0.12). These results not only confirm the incidence of non-local muscle fatigue (NLMF) in response to performing submaximal isotonic fatiguing contractions but also as a new finding, imply that both spinal and supraspinal modulations account for the NLMF response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.