Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35460340›Full record

ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2022

Long-term administration of fisetin was not as effective as short term in ameliorating IR injury in isolated rat heart.

Priyanka N Prem, Bhavana Sivakumar, Sri Rahavi Boovarahan, Gino A Kurian

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Priyanka N PremVascular Biology Lab, SASTRA Deemed University, 117, Anusandhan Kendra, Tamil Nadu, 613401, Tirumalaisamudram Thanjavur, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5817-8413
Bhavana SivakumarVascular Biology Lab, SASTRA Deemed University, 117, Anusandhan Kendra, Tamil Nadu, 613401, Tirumalaisamudram Thanjavur, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9137-8150
Sri Rahavi BoovarahanVascular Biology Lab, SASTRA Deemed University, 117, Anusandhan Kendra, Tamil Nadu, 613401, Tirumalaisamudram Thanjavur, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1465-7834
Gino A KurianVascular Biology Lab, SASTRA Deemed University, 117, Anusandhan Kendra, Tamil Nadu, 613401, Tirumalaisamudram Thanjavur, India. kurian@scbt.sastra.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2051-2399
SASTRA University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study aims to determine the comparative efficacy of fisetin in reducing myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (IR) in isolated rat hearts when the drug was given either oral or intraperitoneal (ip) for short-term and long-term administration. Rats treated with fisetin (20 mg/kg-oral/ip) for short (30 min prior to surgery) and long (15 days prior to surgery followed by 1-day washout) duration were subjected to myocardial IR using Langendorf perfusion system. Hemodynamics, cardiac injury, mitochondrial functional assessment, and fisetin levels were estimated. Unlike the long-term administration of fisetin, the short-term treated-rat heart exhibited significant cardioprotection, measured via hemodynamic indices (RPP in mmHg × beats/min × 10

Indexed as

Myocardial Reperfusion InjuryAnimalsFlavonolsHeartInfarctionOxidative StressRatsfisetinFlavonolsCardioprotectionFisetinIsolated rat heartMyocardial ischemia–reperfusionShort term vs long term

Identifiers

PMID35460340
PMCPMC9033933
OpenAlexW4224218346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.