ArticleGenetics2022
Genome-wide mediation analysis: an empirical study to connect phenotype with genotype via intermediate transcriptomic data in maize.
Article in Genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The incomplete dominance of gene expression controlled by Trans-eQTL hotspots contributes to heterosis in maize.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Introducing Concurrent Imaging and Unidimensional Analytics for Plant Stress Responses.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting Gene Expression Responses to Cold inGenes · 2025Article
- TWAS facilitates gene-scale trait genetic dissection through gene expression, structural variations, and alternative splicing in soybean.Plant communications · 2024Article
- Large-scale statistical analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome sequences identifies compensatory mutations associated with multi-drug resistance.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Microbiome-enabled genomic selection improves prediction accuracy for nitrogen-related traits in maize.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mapping genotype to phenotype is an essential topic in genetics and genomics research. As the Omics data become increasingly available, 2-variable methods have been widely applied to associate genotype with the phenotype (genome-wide association study), gene expression with the phenotype (transcriptome-wide association study), and genotype with gene expression. However, signals detected by these 2-variable association methods suffer from low mapping resolution or inexplicit causality between genotype and phenotype, making it challenging to interpret and validate the molecular mechanisms of the underlying genomic variations and the candidate genes. Under the context of genetics research, we hypothesized a causal chain from genotype to phenotype partially mediated by intermediate molecular processes, i.e. gene expression. To test this hypothesis, we applied the high-dimensional mediation analysis, a class of causal inference method with an assumed causal chain from the exposure to the mediator to the outcome, and implemented it with a maize association panel (N = 280 lines). Using 40 publicly available agronomy traits, 66 newly generated metabolite traits, and published RNA-seq data from 7 different tissues, our empirical study detected 736 unique mediating genes. Noticeably, 83/736 (11%) genes were identified in mediating more than 1 trait, suggesting the prevalence of pleiotropic mediating effects. We demonstrated that several identified mediating genes are consistent with their known functions. In addition, our results provided explicit hypotheses for functional validation and suggested that the mediation analysis is a powerful tool to integrate Omics data to connect genotype to phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.