Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35460193›Full record

ArticleZoonoses and public health2022

Presence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Escherichia coli, Enterococcusspp. and Salmonellasp. in 12 species of Australian shorebirds and terns.

Hannah G Smith, David C Bean, Rohan H Clarke, Richard Loyn, Jo-Ann Larkins, Chris Hassell, Andrew R Greenhill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoonoses and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A Two-Year Study on Swifts (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hannah G SmithInstitute of Innovation, Science and Sustainability, Federation University, Churchill, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7545-335X
David C BeanInstitute of Innovation, Science and Sustainability, Federation University, Churchill, Australia.
Rohan H ClarkeSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Richard LoynSchool of Life Sciences, Centre for Freshwater Ecosystems, La Trobe University, Wodonga, Victoria, Australia.
Jo-Ann LarkinsInstitute of Innovation, Science and Sustainability, Federation University, Churchill, Australia.
Chris HassellGlobal Flyway Network, Broome, Western Australia, Australia.
Andrew R GreenhillInstitute of Innovation, Science and Sustainability, Federation University, Churchill, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5831-8714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance is an ongoing threat to both human and animal health. Migratory birds are a potential vector for the spread of novel pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes. To date, there has been no comprehensive study investigating the presence of antibiotic resistance (AMR) in the bacteria of Australian shorebirds or terns. In the current study, 1022 individual birds representing 12 species were sampled across three states of Australia (Victoria, South Australia, and Western Australia) and tested for the presence of phenotypically resistant strains of three bacteria with potential to be zoonotic pathogens; Escherichia coli, Enterococcusspp., and Salmonellasp. In total, 206 E. coli, 266 Enterococcusspp., and 20 Salmonellasp. isolates were recovered, with AMR detected in 42% of E. coli, 85% of Enterococcusspp., and 10% of Salmonellasp. Phenotypic resistance was commonly detected to erythromycin (79% of Enterococcusspp.), ciprofloxacin (31% of Enterococcusspp.) and streptomycin (21% of E. coli). Resident birds were more likely to carry AMR bacteria than migratory birds (p ≤ .001). Bacteria isolated from shorebirds and terns are commonly resistant to at least one antibiotic, suggesting that wild bird populations serve as a potential reservoir and vector for AMR bacteria. However, globally emerging phenotypes of multidrug-resistant bacteria were not detected in Australian shorebirds. This study provides baseline data of the carriage of AMR bacteria in Australian shorebirds and terns.

Indexed as

CharadriiformesEscherichia coli InfectionsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAustraliaBirdsDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliFecesHumansAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic resistanceenteric bacteriamigratory shorebirdswildlife

Identifiers

PMID35460193
PMCPMC9544147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.