Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35460164›Full record

ArticleNursing & health sciences2022

Home care providers' perceptions of shared decision-making with older clients (and their caregivers): A cross-sectional study.

Claudia Lai, Paul Holyoke, Karine V Plourde, Lily Yeung, France Légaré

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing & health sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claudia LaiTier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Paul HolyokeSE Research Centre, SE Health, Markham, Ontario, Canada.
Karine V PlourdeTier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Lily YeungParticipant Partner, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
France LégaréTier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2296-6696

Funding

The funding source for this work was a Foundation Grant (#FDN-159937) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interprofessional care teams can play a key role in supporting older adults (and caregivers) in making informed health decisions, yet shared decision making is not widely practiced in home care. Based on an earlier needs assessment with older adults (and caregivers) with home care experience, we aimed to explore the perceptions of home care teams on the decisions facing their clients and their perceived involvement in shared decision making. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 614 home care providers (nurses, personal support workers, rehabilitation professionals) in three Canadian provinces (Quebec, Ontario, and Alberta). Home care providers considered the decision "to stay at home or move" as the most difficult for older adults. Those most frequently involved in decision making with older adults were family members and least involved were physicians. Although all home care providers reported high levels of shared decision-making, we detected an effect of respondent's discipline on self-perceived shared decision-making; nurses and rehabilitation professionals reported significantly higher levels of shared decision making than personal support workers. A more tailored approach is required to support shared decision making in interprofessional care teams.

Indexed as

CaregiversHome Care ServicesAgedCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingDecision Making, SharedHumansagedaged, 80 and overallied health personneldecision making sharedhome care servicesparticipatory researchpersonal support workers

Identifiers

PMID35460164
PMCPMC9322282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.